H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Eugenie Bouchard vs Vania King H2H: 0-1

Vania King holds a 1–0 lead over Eugenie Bouchard in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vania King leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Vania King won the 2014 Libéma Open round of 32 2-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Eugenie Bouchard
Canada Age 32 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Vania King
USA Age 37 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Vania King #75 2-6 6-3 6-3 Eugenie Bouchard #13 Match data Jun 19, 2014* R32 Libéma Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Eugenie Bouchard #1,002 #5 4,793 1,927 158 147 51.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Vania King #824 #50 1,225 1,767 128 160 44.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Eugenie Bouchard Vania King
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #164 1,519 0 0
17 2011 1–3 25.0% #305 1,492 0 0 2006 16–13 55.2% #60 1,662 0 1
18 2012 5–4 55.6% #147 1,546 0 0 2007 15–21 41.7% #109 1,625 0 1
19 2013 25–17 59.5% #32 1,751 0 0 2008 7–19 26.9% #128 1,519 0 1
20 2014 39–23 62.9% #7 1,862 0 1 2009 11–12 47.8% #80 1,591 0 1
21 2015 12–17 41.4% #49 1,701 0 1 2010 14–17 45.2% #86 1,597 0 1
22 2016 29–24 54.7% #46 1,697 0 1 2011 13–14 48.1% #76 1,691 0 1
23 2017 11–20 35.5% #81 1,601 0 1 2012 15–19 44.1% #69 1,617 0 1
24 2018 11–13 45.8% #87 1,670 0 1 2013 8–11 42.1% #85 1,631 0 1
25 2019 4–10 28.6% #215 1,617 0 1 2014 13–15 46.4% #111 1,650 0 1
26 2020 10–4 71.4% #141 1,713 0 1 2015 0–1 0.0% #410 1,634 0 1
27 2021 4–3 57.1% #253 1,704 0 1 2016 13–11 54.2% #78 1,646 0 1
28 2022 3–5 37.5% #326 1,632 0 1 2017 1–3 25.0% #492 1,593 0 1
29 2023 3–3 50.0% #287 1,637 0 1 2018 1–3 25.0% #356 1,560 0 1
31 2025 1–1 50.0% — 1,610 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Eugenie Bouchard Vania King
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2011 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 15 10 25 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 2012 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 2007 11 14 25 44.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 2013 15 11 26 57.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2008 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 2014 18 16 34 52.9% 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2009 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2015 10 9 19 52.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2010 9 10 19 47.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 2016 20 16 36 55.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2011 9 10 19 47.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2017 7 14 21 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 2012 12 13 25 48.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2018 7 10 17 41.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 7 8 15 46.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2020 2 1 3 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2021 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2022 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2017 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2025 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 98 101 199 49.2% 45 29 74 60.8% 15 17 32 46.9% — 96 109 205 46.8% 26 36 62 41.9% 6 15 21 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 282/306 of Eugenie Bouchard's and 237/288 of Vania King's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Eugenie Bouchard Vania King
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/2 3.0 1.0 63.3% 52.6% 36.4% 50.0% 0.0% 46.7% 33.3%
17 2011 4/4 2.0 2.5 64.1% 64.4% 38.1% 59.9% 56.7% 54.8% 34.9% 2006 9/29 1.0 1.1 71.3% 60.7% 43.6% 55.0% 59.8% 55.8% 44.1%
18 2012 9/9 3.7 3.1 58.4% 66.2% 47.0% 58.4% 39.6% 58.4% 43.0% 2007 21/36 1.2 2.7 63.7% 58.9% 44.6% 48.9% 39.1% 54.0% 37.7%
19 2013 34/42 2.3 2.6 56.8% 64.2% 47.1% 51.2% 44.0% 56.7% 46.5% 2008 25/26 1.5 1.7 66.0% 61.8% 43.9% 51.8% 42.8% 55.6% 39.5%
20 2014 57/62 2.6 3.1 60.4% 66.0% 47.6% 54.0% 50.3% 58.5% 46.5% 2009 20/23 0.8 1.9 63.1% 58.0% 46.4% 47.2% 37.3% 53.7% 42.1%
21 2015 25/29 1.7 4.0 60.1% 62.4% 47.7% 49.2% 48.0% 56.8% 41.5% 2010 29/31 0.6 2.7 65.9% 61.5% 41.9% 49.4% 41.0% 55.1% 44.8%
22 2016 50/54 2.3 3.2 60.4% 63.6% 48.8% 50.2% 45.9% 57.8% 44.7% 2011 24/27 0.6 3.6 64.0% 59.5% 42.2% 53.5% 45.2% 53.2% 44.9%
23 2017 28/31 2.3 3.5 58.3% 58.7% 45.0% 49.3% 48.3% 53.0% 42.7% 2012 33/34 0.7 1.7 64.1% 62.4% 47.4% 51.5% 43.8% 57.0% 43.5%
24 2018 24/24 3.0 3.6 59.2% 63.1% 44.0% 57.2% 46.4% 55.5% 44.2% 2013 17/19 0.6 2.4 69.2% 57.3% 46.4% 44.7% 46.8% 53.7% 41.1%
25 2019 14/14 1.3 4.0 60.7% 60.7% 42.3% 50.0% 54.0% 53.3% 42.9% 2014 25/28 0.7 2.4 64.2% 58.6% 47.1% 50.6% 43.5% 54.3% 42.6%
26 2020 14/14 2.8 1.8 65.5% 65.3% 49.8% 61.5% 49.6% 59.8% 45.5% 2015 1/1 1.0 1.0 61.3% 55.3% 33.3% 16.7% 50.0% 46.8% 39.7%
27 2021 7/7 2.7 2.9 62.7% 65.2% 45.7% 49.6% 50.9% 57.9% 46.8% 2016 24/24 1.4 2.8 63.1% 64.2% 43.8% 58.8% 50.1% 56.6% 44.1%
28 2022 8/8 2.8 1.5 57.0% 61.4% 51.7% 60.8% 45.3% 57.3% 42.6% 2017 4/4 1.0 2.3 70.4% 50.1% 40.7% 56.3% 55.7% 48.5% 38.6%
29 2023 6/6 2.3 1.7 66.8% 62.6% 52.8% 41.7% 51.9% 59.0% 43.5% 2018 4/4 1.0 2.8 60.3% 52.3% 38.6% 54.3% 41.8% 47.0% 40.7%
31 2025 2/2 1.0 2.0 62.0% 59.5% 47.9% 54.2% 37.4% 55.1% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 282/306 2.4 3.1 60.0% 63.5% 47.1% 52.6% 47.7% 56.9% 44.5% — 237/288 0.9 2.4 65.0% 60.2% 44.5% 51.2% 44.0% 54.7% 42.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Eugenie Bouchard Vania King
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1520 103.7 -0.64 +0.14 0.625 40.2% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.17
17 2011 1493 102.7 -1.04 -2.27 0.773 45.8% +18 — — 33.3% -1.78 0–1 1–0 — -0.10 2006 1663 131.1 -1.06 -0.47 0.997 50.5% +24 — — 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 -0.14
18 2012 1546 114.3 +1.12 -0.43 1.033 50.7% +7 — — 52.4% +0.38 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.18 2007 1625 116.9 -1.39 -3.73 0.818 45.8% +17 -157 +16 43.0% -0.67 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 102.4 -1.23
19 2013 1752 141.5 +1.07 +2.65 1.074 51.5% -37 -74 -156 58.2% +0.47 7–9 (44%) 8–1 (89%) 106.1 -1.18 2008 1519 117.6 +0.05 -3.22 0.890 47.7% +49 -52 — 33.9% -0.89 5–7 (42%) 1–5 (17%) 94.7 -1.09
20 2014 1863 150.8 +2.70 +3.29 1.122 52.4% -96 +19 -107 61.4% +0.82 10–8 (56%) 7–5 (58%) 104.2 -1.19 2009 1592 114.9 -1.54 -1.39 0.910 48.1% +21 -123 -33 44.9% -0.45 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 +0.36
21 2015 1702 123.0 -1.20 +0.51 0.961 49.3% +34 +67 -27 50.0% -0.02 3–7 (30%) 6–5 (55%) 94.8 +1.50 2010 1598 117.8 -1.20 +0.84 0.997 49.8% +24 -97 -78 49.3% -0.17 4–9 (31%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.43
22 2016 1697 133.5 +1.68 +1.09 1.060 51.1% -16 +85 -6 54.6% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 99.4 -1.41 2011 1691 130.5 -1.09 +0.98 0.960 48.9% -18 -128 — 48.4% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.8 -1.31
23 2017 1602 127.4 -1.89 -0.77 0.909 47.9% -17 +221 +25 40.3% -0.82 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 93.2 -0.95 2012 1618 128.3 +0.93 +0.08 1.011 50.1% +21 -46 — 48.0% -0.05 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 99.5 -1.01
24 2018 1670 127.3 -0.75 +1.08 0.994 49.8% -14 +151 — 42.2% -0.31 2–1 (67%) 5–0 (100%) 106.6 +0.16 2013 1631 118.3 -0.91 -1.79 0.887 47.5% +1 -43 — 41.7% -0.79 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 103.1 -0.53
25 2019 1617 127.0 -1.49 -0.31 0.919 47.9% +26 — — 38.2% -0.62 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.76 2014 1650 125.5 -1.58 -0.66 0.932 48.6% +18 -55 -202 49.2% -0.07 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 105.8 -1.14
26 2020 1713 127.8 +1.82 +1.44 1.130 52.7% -64 +114 — 65.7% +1.00 4–3 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 100.7 +0.41 2015 1635 102.3 +0.69 -0.52 0.746 43.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.02
27 2021 1704 112.6 +0.44 +0.05 1.114 52.1% -53 — — 53.3% +0.40 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.45 2016 1646 125.1 +0.57 +0.85 1.016 50.3% +12 -20 — 53.7% +0.11 3–3 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 102.4 +0.71
28 2022 1633 117.1 +0.22 +0.59 0.998 50.2% -38 — — 52.9% +0.18 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 97.2 +0.57 2017 1593 108.4 -1.97 -0.89 0.750 44.4% +4 — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.16
29 2023 1637 118.3 +0.17 -0.98 1.060 51.3% — +151 — 53.3% +0.13 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.7 +1.03 2018 1560 104.4 -2.66 -1.04 0.768 44.2% +6 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 1–0 — +0.17
30 2024 1618 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1541 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2025 1611 113.9 +1.04 -0.76 0.931 48.7% — — — 50.0% -0.17 1–1 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1927 140.4 +0.68 +1.24 1.032 50.6% -27 +65 -55 53.1% +0.19 43–57 (43%) 45–29 (61%) 102.0 -0.43 — 1767 127.9 -0.67 -0.74 0.935 48.6% +17 -80 -68 46.2% -0.31 46–50 (48%) 34–30 (53%) 104.0 -1.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.