Eva Krapl
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ann Henricksson | 3 | 1 | 4 | Apr 27, 1989 | H2H |
| Claudia Porwik | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 5, 1989 | H2H |
| Liz Smylie | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 9, 1989 | H2H |
| Michelle Jaggard Lai | 2 | 0 | 2 | Apr 28, 1989 | H2H |
| Andrea Holikova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Mar 21, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Eva Krapl vs Julie Richardson H2H: 1-0
Eva Krapl holds a 1–0 lead over Julie Richardson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eva Krapl leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Eva Krapl won the 1986 Bregenz round of 32 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Krapl | 6-0 6-2 | Julie Richardson | Match data | Jul 17, 1986* | R32 | Bregenz | WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Krapl | #635 | #94 | 11 | 1,559 | 35 | 67 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julie Richardson | #643 | #102 | 9 | 1,574 | 28 | 65 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Krapl | Julie Richardson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #162 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #129 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #157 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #120 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #103 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #115 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #137 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #202 | 1,403 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #556 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #157 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #301 | 1,411 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #367 | 1,400 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Eva Krapl | Julie Richardson | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1986 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1987 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1987 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1988 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1988 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1989 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1990 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 18 | 30 | 48 | 37.5% | 11 | 21 | 32 | 34.4% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | 19 | 41 | 60 | 31.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 9 | 17 | 26 | 34.6% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Eva Krapl | Julie Richardson | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1981 | 1495 | 102.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1982 | 1491 | 102.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +31 | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | — | — | +0.84 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 1475 | 91.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | +0.20 | 1985 | 1506 | 109.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +98 | 45.5% | +0.09 | 0–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.50 |
| 19 | 1985 | 1535 | 108.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 57.1% | +0.33 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.35 | 1986 | 1457 | 96.3 | — | — | — | — | +67 | — | — | 11.8% | -2.65 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.40 |
| 20 | 1986 | 1493 | 104.0 | — | — | — | — | +24 | +51 | — | 37.5% | -0.66 | 1–5 (17%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +1.71 | 1987 | 1481 | 103.7 | — | — | — | — | +21 | — | +115 | 41.4% | -0.66 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–2 (33%) | 101.9 | +1.02 |
| 21 | 1987 | 1484 | 110.5 | — | — | — | — | -27 | +85 | +31 | 34.1% | -0.95 | 3–3 (50%) | 0–5 (0%) | 97.5 | +1.06 | 1988 | 1558 | 120.8 | — | — | — | — | -12 | — | +44 | 45.8% | -0.20 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–5 (29%) | 98.0 | +1.35 |
| 22 | 1988 | 1496 | 112.8 | — | — | — | — | +6 | +12 | -25 | 34.6% | -1.06 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | 101.0 | +0.57 | 1989 | 1507 | 105.8 | — | — | — | — | -9 | — | +69 | 21.1% | -2.21 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +0.02 |
| 23 | 1989 | 1486 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | +4 | — | — | 37.8% | -0.89 | 4–1 (80%) | 4–3 (57%) | 106.3 | +2.34 | 1990 | 1528 | 104.3 | — | — | — | — | -8 | — | +52 | 44.0% | -0.60 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–2 | — | +0.93 |
| 24 | 1990 | 1404 | 88.5 | — | — | — | — | +55 | +30 | — | 28.0% | -1.72 | 0–3 (0%) | — | — | +1.58 | 1991 | 1504 | 101.0 | — | — | — | — | -22 | — | — | 0.0% | -3.33 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.21 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1460 | 107.6 | — | — | — | — | -39 | — | +124 | 19.0% | -2.00 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | 97.8 | -0.25 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1411 | 93.4 | — | — | — | — | -32 | — | — | 21.4% | -2.29 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.47 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1400 | 94.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -3.40 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.09 |
| Career | — | 1560 | 105.6 | — | — | — | — | +10 | +48 | 0 | 36.8% | -0.91 | 13–16 (45%) | 8–15 (35%) | 97.5 | +8.16 | — | 1575 | 110.1 | — | — | — | — | -5 | — | +83 | 33.5% | -1.18 | 11–13 (46%) | 8–15 (35%) | 97.9 | +4.45 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Julie Richardson
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pascale Paradis Mangon | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 23, 1992 | H2H |
| Gretchen Magers | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 20, 1990 | H2H |
| Rosalyn Fairbank | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 28, 1989 | H2H |
| Ann Henricksson | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 15, 1989 | H2H |
| Laura Golarsa | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 3, 1993 | H2H |