H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Eva Lys vs Sorana Cirstea H2H: 1-2
Sorana Cirstea holds a 2–1 lead over Eva Lys in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Sorana Cirstea leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sorana Cirstea won the 2026 Roland Garros second round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 24
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 36
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2026 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Sorana Cirstea | 6-3 6-0 | Eva Lys | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2026 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Sorana Cirstea | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Eva Lys | Match data |
| Oct 19, 2023* | Cluj Napoca | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Eva Lys | 6-3 6-3 | Sorana Cirstea | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Lys | #85 | #39 | 1,303 | 1,885 | 44 | 45 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sorana Cirstea | #17 | #17 | 2,535 | 2,024 | 373 | 343 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Lys | Sorana Cirstea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #353 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #45 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #93 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #136 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #60 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2024 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #131 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #27 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2025 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,855 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #22 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2026 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #85 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #94 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #242 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #79 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #37 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #84 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #74 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #71 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #39 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #26 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #69 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #43 | 1,870 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 30–11 | 73.2% | #17 | 1,985 | 0 | 4 |