H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Eva Pfaff vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 1-0

Eva Pfaff holds a 1–0 lead over Kathy Horvath in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eva Pfaff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eva Pfaff won the 1989 Key Biscayne round of 128 7-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Eva Pfaff
GER Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kathy Horvath
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Eva Pfaff #67 7-6 7-5 Kathy Horvath #82 Match data Mar 21, 1989* R128 Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Eva Pfaff — #17 21 1,902 155 202 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kathy Horvath — #10 24 1,976 187 155 54.7% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Eva Pfaff Kathy Horvath
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1979 0–2 0.0% — 1,496 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1980 6–7 46.2% — 1,565 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1981 34–23 59.6% — 1,860 0 2
16 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0 1982 15–17 46.9% — 1,776 0 2
17 — — — — — — — 1983 39–18 68.4% — 1,931 0 4
18 — — — — — — — 1984 25–19 56.8% #29 1,800 0 4
19 1980 12–11 52.2% — 1,608 0 0 1985 23–16 59.0% — 1,776 0 6
20 1981 14–19 42.4% — 1,632 0 0 1986 16–15 51.6% #47 1,740 0 6
21 1982 18–22 45.0% — 1,776 0 0 1987 18–15 54.5% #37 1,714 0 7
22 1983 31–21 59.6% — 1,857 0 0 1988 9–15 37.5% #85 1,603 0 7
23 1984 14–14 50.0% #31 1,797 0 0 1989 2–8 20.0% #224 1,529 0 7
24 1985 9–11 45.0% — 1,739 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1986 14–19 42.4% #58 1,690 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1987 19–20 48.7% #44 1,744 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1988 8–17 32.0% #74 1,648 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1989 12–23 34.3% #104 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1990 3–12 20.0% #152 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1991 1–10 9.1% #203 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 1992 0–2 0.0% #420 1,459 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Eva Pfaff Kathy Horvath
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — 12 11 23 52.2%
16 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 9 4 13 69.2% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 9 3 12 75.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 21 9 30 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
19 1980 — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1985 6 5 11 54.5% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
20 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1986 8 7 15 53.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 8 13 38.5% 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1983 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 1988 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 1989 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1986 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1988 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1989 9 13 22 40.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 35 64 99 35.4% 34 47 81 42.0% 44 40 84 52.4% 42 50 92 45.7% — 45 50 95 47.4% 111 67 178 62.4% 3 6 9 33.3% 28 32 60 46.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Eva Pfaff Kathy Horvath
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1497 113.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 0–1 — -0.25
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1565 110.9 — — — — +47 -65 — 43.3% -0.37 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 101.9 -0.11
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1860 146.7 — — — — -39 -79 — 55.9% +0.43 12–7 (63%) 7–5 (58%) 109.3 +0.11
16 1977 1481 98.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.33 1982 1776 143.4 — — — — -40 +61 — 52.9% +0.46 1–7 (13%) 2–3 (40%) 92.6 -3.75
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1931 149.2 — — — — -63 +56 — 63.7% +0.74 9–3 (75%) 11–6 (65%) 109.3 +1.20
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1800 146.8 — — — — -83 +207 — 56.1% +0.43 5–5 (50%) 3–7 (30%) 94.7 +0.22
19 1980 1608 121.1 — — — — 0 -3 — 48.0% -0.16 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.2 -0.01 1985 1776 138.1 — — — — -111 +221 — 55.8% +0.24 6–2 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 104.1 -0.66
20 1981 1633 123.6 — — — — -26 +24 -31 45.1% -0.34 3–6 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.5 +3.20 1986 1740 130.5 — — — — -74 +185 -139 48.6% -0.18 7–3 (70%) 3–3 (50%) 104.3 -1.03
21 1982 1776 132.9 — — — — -155 -166 -35 45.2% -0.12 7–6 (54%) 4–5 (44%) 102.9 -0.97 1987 1714 126.0 — — — — -42 +149 — 54.1% +0.18 6–4 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 101.2 +3.31
22 1983 1857 145.5 — — — — -98 -98 -30 57.1% +0.32 9–8 (53%) 9–3 (75%) 108.7 +0.77 1988 1603 116.3 — — — — +8 +113 — 41.5% -0.64 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 94.3 +0.35
23 1984 1798 132.8 — — — — +13 -37 -34 47.5% +0.07 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.40 1989 1530 101.0 — — — — +18 — — 33.3% -1.38 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 95.4 +0.25
24 1985 1740 120.9 — — — — +36 -87 +40 46.3% -0.29 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1986 1690 126.3 — — — — +52 -69 +30 42.1% -0.32 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 101.8 -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1987 1745 139.9 — — — — +26 -163 +22 49.4% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–3 (70%) 104.9 -1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1988 1649 121.4 — — — — +54 -104 +45 33.9% -1.09 5–3 (63%) 1–5 (17%) 99.9 -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1989 1588 119.7 — — — — +15 — +82 36.3% -1.10 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 1522 111.6 — — — — -3 — — 33.3% -1.19 0–6 (0%) 0–2 — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 1470 118.6 — — — — +22 — — 16.0% -2.28 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.6 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 1460 103.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1903 135.7 — — — — -11 -66 -3 44.1% -0.41 49–53 (48%) 36–40 (47%) 102.6 +0.24 — 1976 144.1 — — — — -48 +106 -139 53.7% +0.21 50–40 (56%) 39–36 (52%) 103.7 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.