H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Eva Pfaff vs Pam Casale H2H: 0-3

Pam Casale holds a 3–0 lead over Eva Pfaff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Pam Casale leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1988 Key Biscayne round of 128 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Eva Pfaff
GER Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Pam Casale
USA Age 62 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Casale #128 6-4 6-2 Eva Pfaff #50 Match data Mar 15, 1988* R128 Key Biscayne WTA 500 Hard
Pam Casale #18 6-4 6-1 Eva Pfaff #32 Match data Oct 11, 1984* R32 Tampa WTA 250 Hard
Pam Casale #26 6-2 6-2 Eva Pfaff #22 Match data Feb 23, 1984* R32 East Hanover WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Eva Pfaff — #17 21 1,902 155 202 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pam Casale — #14 22 1,944 168 147 53.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Eva Pfaff Pam Casale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,597 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1981 30–17 63.8% — 1,811 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1982 20–23 46.5% — 1,746 0 0
19 1980 12–11 52.2% — 1,608 0 0 1983 23–20 53.5% — 1,770 0 0
20 1981 14–19 42.4% — 1,632 0 0 1984 31–17 64.6% #15 1,914 0 0
21 1982 18–22 45.0% — 1,776 0 0 1985 24–20 54.5% — 1,815 0 0
22 1983 31–21 59.6% — 1,857 0 0 1986 16–17 48.5% #41 1,788 0 0
23 1984 14–14 50.0% #31 1,797 0 0 1987 5–11 31.2% #111 1,673 0 0
24 1985 9–11 45.0% — 1,739 0 0 1988 4–10 28.6% #169 1,552 0 0
25 1986 14–19 42.4% #58 1,690 0 0 1989 0–1 0.0% #225 1,547 0 0
26 1987 19–20 48.7% #44 1,744 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,526 0 0
27 1988 8–17 32.0% #74 1,648 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1989 12–23 34.3% #104 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1990 3–12 20.0% #152 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1991 1–10 9.1% #203 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 1992 0–2 0.0% #420 1,459 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Eva Pfaff Pam Casale
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1980 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 17 6 23 73.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
19 1980 — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1984 8 3 11 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7%
21 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 8 13 38.5% 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
22 1983 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 1986 3 6 9 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
23 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1986 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1988 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1989 9 13 22 40.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 35 64 99 35.4% 34 47 81 42.0% 44 40 84 52.4% 42 50 92 45.7% — 66 49 115 57.4% 55 41 96 57.3% 15 19 34 44.1% 25 35 60 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Eva Pfaff Pam Casale
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1977 1481 98.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.33 1980 1598 118.8 — — — — +31 — — 57.4% +0.72 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +2.08
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1811 140.6 — — — — -1 -153 -195 64.1% +1.03 3–6 (33%) 6–0 (100%) 101.9 +2.45
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1746 140.5 — — — — -55 -5 -107 50.5% +0.01 1–8 (11%) 9–5 (64%) 95.6 -2.94
19 1980 1608 121.1 — — — — 0 -3 — 48.0% -0.16 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.2 -0.01 1983 1771 144.3 — — — — -54 +93 -103 52.1% +0.47 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.6 -1.30
20 1981 1633 123.6 — — — — -26 +24 -31 45.1% -0.34 3–6 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.5 +3.20 1984 1915 155.4 — — — — +5 -61 -210 64.8% +1.01 3–6 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 100.3 -3.10
21 1982 1776 132.9 — — — — -155 -166 -35 45.2% -0.12 7–6 (54%) 4–5 (44%) 102.9 -0.97 1985 1815 137.8 — — — — +80 -55 -189 53.1% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.03
22 1983 1857 145.5 — — — — -98 -98 -30 57.1% +0.32 9–8 (53%) 9–3 (75%) 108.7 +0.77 1986 1788 137.2 — — — — -55 +53 — 46.8% -0.18 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 103.8 -3.60
23 1984 1798 132.8 — — — — +13 -37 -34 47.5% +0.07 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.40 1987 1674 114.3 — — — — -20 — -78 41.7% -0.56 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.56
24 1985 1740 120.9 — — — — +36 -87 +40 46.3% -0.29 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.72 1988 1552 100.5 — — — — +26 +207 — 36.4% -0.79 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 92.4 +1.02
25 1986 1690 126.3 — — — — +52 -69 +30 42.1% -0.32 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 101.8 -0.11 1989 1547 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.23
26 1987 1745 139.9 — — — — +26 -163 +22 49.4% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–3 (70%) 104.9 -1.01 1990 1526 90.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.21
27 1988 1649 121.4 — — — — +54 -104 +45 33.9% -1.09 5–3 (63%) 1–5 (17%) 99.9 -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1989 1588 119.7 — — — — +15 — +82 36.3% -1.10 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 1522 111.6 — — — — -3 — — 33.3% -1.19 0–6 (0%) 0–2 — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 1470 118.6 — — — — +22 — — 16.0% -2.28 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.6 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 1460 103.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1903 135.7 — — — — -11 -66 -3 44.1% -0.41 49–53 (48%) 36–40 (47%) 102.6 +0.24 — 1945 143.6 — — — — +2 +5 -154 53.9% +0.36 32–43 (43%) 38–21 (64%) 100.1 -2.23

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.