H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Eva Pfaff vs Robin White H2H: 2-1
Eva Pfaff holds a 2–1 lead over Robin White in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Eva Pfaff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eva Pfaff won the 1987 Toronto second round 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 65
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1987 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Eva Pfaff | 7-6 6-4 | Robin White | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1985* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Robin White | 6-3 6-2 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
| Nov 17, 1983* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Eva Pfaff | 6-3 7-6 | Robin White | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eva Pfaff | #420 | #17 | 21 | 1,902 | 155 | 202 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Robin White | #565 | #15 | 37 | 1,878 | 142 | 158 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eva Pfaff | Robin White | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #32 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1983 | 31–21 | 59.6% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #16 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #56 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1986 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1987 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1988 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #74 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1989 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #56 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1990 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #203 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,539 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |