H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Evgenia Linetskaya vs Edina Gallovits Hall H2H: 1-0
Evgenia Linetskaya holds a 1–0 lead over Edina Gallovits Hall in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Evgenia Linetskaya leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Evgenia Linetskaya won the 2005 Memphis third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 39
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 41
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2005* | Memphis | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Evgenia Linetskaya | 6-4 6-3 | Edina Gallovits Hall | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evgenia Linetskaya | #1,056 | #35 | 826 | 1,715 | 21 | 23 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Edina Gallovits Hall | — | — | — | 1,642 | 50 | 80 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Evgenia Linetskaya | Edina Gallovits Hall | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #95 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1217 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1056 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |