H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Evgeniya Rodina vs Anna Chakvetadze H2H: 1-1
Evgeniya Rodina and Anna Chakvetadze are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anna Chakvetadze leads 1–0 on grass, while Evgeniya Rodina leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Evgeniya Rodina won the 2010 Tashkent fourth round 7-6(4) 3-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2010* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Evgeniya Rodina | 7-6(4) 3-2 (ret.) | Anna Chakvetadze | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2008* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Anna Chakvetadze | 6-4 6-3 | Evgeniya Rodina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evgeniya Rodina | #1,376 | #67 | 882 | 1,663 | 74 | 119 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anna Chakvetadze | #577 | #5 | 2,940 | 2,067 | 183 | 135 | 57.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Evgeniya Rodina | Anna Chakvetadze | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #320 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #13 | 1,936 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 56–19 | 74.7% | #6 | 1,984 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #107 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 2011 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #106 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #67 | 1,711 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #370 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,715 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #234 | 1,641 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #224 | 1,557 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2016 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2017 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2018 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2019 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #295 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #438 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2023 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #443 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |