H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Evgeniya Rodina vs Ekaterina Ivanova H2H: 1-0
Evgeniya Rodina holds a 1–0 lead over Ekaterina Ivanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Evgeniya Rodina leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Evgeniya Rodina won the 2010 Charleston second round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2010* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Evgeniya Rodina | 6-4 6-1 | Ekaterina Ivanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evgeniya Rodina | #1,376 | #67 | 882 | 1,663 | 74 | 119 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ekaterina Ivanova | #1,270 | #136 | 464 | 1,514 | 10 | 16 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Evgeniya Rodina | Ekaterina Ivanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #320 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #211 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #141 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #152 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #107 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #106 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #370 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #295 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #438 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #443 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |