H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Evgeniya Rodina vs Magdalena Rybarikova H2H: 1-0
Evgeniya Rodina holds a 1–0 lead over Magdalena Rybarikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Evgeniya Rodina leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Evgeniya Rodina won the 2011 Linz third round 6-3 2-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2011* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Evgeniya Rodina | 6-3 2-1 (ret.) | Magdalena Rybarikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evgeniya Rodina | #1,376 | #67 | 882 | 1,663 | 74 | 119 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Magdalena Rybarikova | #199 | #17 | 2,405 | 1,817 | 188 | 207 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Evgeniya Rodina | Magdalena Rybarikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #320 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #342 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #44 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #107 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #106 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2011 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #106 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #370 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #62 | 1,605 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #37 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,691 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #80 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2016 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2017 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,794 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2018 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #48 | 1,677 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2019 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #295 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #176 | 1,608 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #438 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2023 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #443 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |