H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Evgeniya Rodina vs Maria Elena Camerin H2H: 0-1
Maria Elena Camerin holds a 1–0 lead over Evgeniya Rodina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Elena Camerin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maria Elena Camerin won the 2011 Barcelona third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2011* | Barcelona | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Maria Elena Camerin | 6-4 7-5 | Evgeniya Rodina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evgeniya Rodina | #1,376 | #67 | 882 | 1,663 | 74 | 119 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maria Elena Camerin | #817 | #41 | 774 | 1,666 | 97 | 147 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Evgeniya Rodina | Maria Elena Camerin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #320 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #112 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #123 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #107 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #100 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #106 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #43 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #370 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #50 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #114 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #111 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2018 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2019 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #295 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #438 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2023 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #443 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |