H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Evgeniya Rodina vs Virginie Razzano H2H: 2-1
Evgeniya Rodina holds a 2–1 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Evgeniya Rodina leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2009 Indian Wells first round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2009* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Virginie Razzano | 6-3 6-4 | Evgeniya Rodina | Match data |
| Jun 25, 2008* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Evgeniya Rodina | 0-6 6-2 6-4 | Virginie Razzano | Match data |
| Mar 12, 2008* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Evgeniya Rodina | 6-0 6-7(2) 6-2 | Virginie Razzano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evgeniya Rodina | #1,376 | #67 | 882 | 1,663 | 74 | 119 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Virginie Razzano | #1,226 | #16 | 2,420 | 1,876 | 200 | 216 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Evgeniya Rodina | Virginie Razzano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #320 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #344 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #143 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #87 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #107 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #60 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #106 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #51 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #370 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #28 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #58 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #19 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2016 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2017 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,681 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2018 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2019 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #295 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #99 | 1,683 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #200 | 1,657 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #438 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2023 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #443 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |