H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Evonne Goolagong vs Kate Latham H2H: 2-0

Evonne Goolagong holds a 2–0 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Evonne Goolagong leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Evonne Goolagong won the 1979 Beckenham quarterfinal 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Evonne Goolagong
AUS Age 75 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 74

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Evonne Goolagong 6-2 6-2 Kate Latham Match data Jun 9, 1979* QF Beckenham WTA 250 Grass
Evonne Goolagong 5-7 6-3 6-1 Kate Latham Match data Sep 26, 1974* R32 Denver WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Evonne Goolagong — #1 — 2,482 736 160 82.1% 7 0 2 8 68 85
Kate Latham — — — 1,865 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Evonne Goolagong Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1968 9–4 69.2% — 1,578 0 1 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 1969 13–8 61.9% — 1,631 0 3 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
18 1970 74–19 79.6% — 2,001 0 13 — — — — — — —
19 1971 94–15 86.2% — 2,177 2 26 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 1972 89–10 89.9% — 2,244 2 39 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1973 105–15 87.5% — 2,298 2 51 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 1974 64–11 85.3% — 2,351 3 59 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 1975 53–15 77.9% #5 2,256 4 63 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 1976 57–6 90.5% #2 2,438 5 70 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,749 0 3
25 1977 20–1 95.2% — 2,449 6 74 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,662 0 3
26 1978 47–9 83.9% #3 2,401 6 80 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,853 0 3
27 1979 53–11 82.8% #4 2,389 6 84 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,750 0 4
28 1980 38–19 66.7% #5 2,217 7 85 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,775 0 5
29 1981 5–3 62.5% — 2,190 7 85 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,685 0 5
30 1982 6–6 50.0% — 2,088 7 85 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,624 0 6
31 1983 9–7 56.2% — 1,970 7 85 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,493 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,527 0 6
33 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,940 7 85 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Evonne Goolagong Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1968 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 — — — — 46 9 55 83.6% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 8 2 10 80.0% 34 3 37 91.9% 36 5 41 87.8% 16 5 21 76.2% 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1972 6 0 6 100.0% 33 3 36 91.7% 47 6 53 88.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 1973 8 2 10 80.0% 57 7 64 89.1% 36 5 41 87.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 14 3 17 82.4% 37 5 42 88.1% 10 1 11 90.9% 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 1975 2 1 3 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 21 3 24 87.5% 22 7 29 75.9% 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1976 1 1 2 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 2 15 86.7% 38 2 40 95.0% 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 20 0 20 100.0% — — — — 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1978 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 26 5 31 83.9% 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 1979 14 3 17 82.4% 14 5 19 73.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 8 1 9 88.9% 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 1980 2 1 3 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 11 2 13 84.6% 19 13 32 59.4% 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 1981 — — — — — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 1983 — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 45 16 61 73.8% 235 49 284 82.7% 306 58 364 84.1% 146 37 183 79.8% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Evonne Goolagong Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1968 1579 113.7 — — — — — +22 -16 65.5% +1.31 2–1 (67%) — — +0.86 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 1969 1631 119.0 — — — — — +3 -2 62.2% +0.87 1–2 (33%) — — +2.49 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
18 1970 2002 148.5 — — — — — +43 -34 73.1% +1.82 18–4 (82%) — — -2.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 2177 163.9 — — — — -178 +39 +100 80.0% +2.29 19–8 (70%) 9–4 (69%) 110.4 -4.23 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.61
20 1972 2245 167.1 — — — — -99 +89 +77 85.6% +2.86 10–4 (71%) 8–4 (67%) 103.9 -4.30 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 1973 2299 171.3 — — — — -145 +134 +109 83.3% +2.75 13–5 (72%) 9–5 (64%) 102.6 -6.29 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.17
22 1974 2351 167.4 — — — — -72 +43 +91 78.5% +2.12 17–7 (71%) 11–5 (69%) 104.6 -5.31 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.71
23 1975 2256 168.1 — — — — -48 +110 +133 73.2% +1.71 10–5 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -6.22 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.34
24 1976 2439 178.8 — — — — +144 -83 -23 86.5% +2.94 6–1 (86%) 5–3 (63%) 106.3 -6.93 1977 1750 140.9 — — — — -8 -120 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -1.23
25 1977 2449 165.5 — — — — — — +82 87.2% +3.19 4–1 (80%) 1–0 — -0.55 1978 1663 118.4 — — — — +3 -12 +67 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +1.97
26 1978 2402 170.2 — — — — +66 — +132 81.4% +2.45 7–2 (78%) 9–4 (69%) 102.5 -1.63 1979 1853 149.7 — — — — -20 -164 -98 46.0% -0.27 8–6 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 -2.28
27 1979 2390 168.6 — — — — +66 -117 +139 80.0% +2.27 11–2 (85%) 4–3 (57%) 100.8 -4.14 1980 1750 133.2 — — — — -27 — +15 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.93
28 1980 2218 171.8 — — — — +111 -3 +350 66.9% +1.37 5–7 (42%) 6–7 (46%) 90.5 -5.94 1981 1776 142.9 — — — — -18 — +4 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.97
29 1981 2191 131.5 — — — — — — +294 58.8% +0.35 1–0 1–0 — -0.64 1982 1686 128.3 — — — — +50 -103 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.20
30 1982 2089 128.7 — — — — — — +199 53.6% +0.25 3–3 (50%) 1–0 — -1.14 1983 1624 115.1 — — — — +52 -49 +72 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.86
31 1983 1970 127.4 — — — — — +106 — 51.4% +0.14 3–0 (100%) 1–0 — -0.01 1984 1493 91.7 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.46
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
33 1985 1941 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2482 170.0 — — — — +11 +58 +94 77.8% +2.18 130–52 (71%) 71–38 (65%) 111.1 -5.29 — 1866 138.2 — — — — -3 -78 -9 49.2% -0.03 56–61 (48%) 41–38 (52%) 101.2 +0.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.