H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Evonne Goolagong vs Nathalie Fuchs H2H: 6-0

Evonne Goolagong holds a 6–0 lead over Nathalie Fuchs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Evonne Goolagong leads 3–0 on clay and 3–0 on grass. Most recently, Evonne Goolagong won the 1973 Roland Garros round of 16 6-0 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Evonne Goolagong
AUS Age 75 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Fuchs
FRA Age 74 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Evonne Goolagong 6-0 6-3 Nathalie Fuchs Match data May 29, 1973* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Evonne Goolagong 6-3 6-0 Nathalie Fuchs Match data Jan 20, 1973* QF Christchurch WTA 250 Grass
Evonne Goolagong 6-4 1-6 6-2 Nathalie Fuchs Match data Jan 14, 1973* QF ASB Classic WTA 250 Grass
Evonne Goolagong 6-3 6-0 Nathalie Fuchs Match data Dec 1, 1972* R16 Brisbane International WTA 500 Grass
Evonne Goolagong 6-3 6-0 Nathalie Fuchs Match data Aug 10, 1972* R32 Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay
Evonne Goolagong 6-0 6-2 Nathalie Fuchs Match data Aug 6, 1972* SF Cincinnati Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Evonne Goolagong #85 #1 — 2,481 736 159 82.2% 7 0 2 8 68 85
Nathalie Fuchs — — — 1,782 104 103 50.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Evonne Goolagong Nathalie Fuchs
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1968 9–4 69.2% — 1,578 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1969 13–8 61.9% — 1,631 0 3 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,489 0 0
18 1970 74–19 79.6% — 2,001 0 13 1971 4–6 40.0% — 1,528 0 0
19 1971 94–15 86.2% — 2,177 2 26 1972 21–21 50.0% — 1,626 0 1
20 1972 89–10 89.9% — 2,244 2 39 1973 28–24 53.8% — 1,682 0 3
21 1973 105–15 87.5% — 2,298 2 51 1974 19–15 55.9% — 1,772 0 4
22 1974 64–11 85.3% — 2,351 3 59 1975 11–16 40.7% — 1,630 0 4
23 1975 53–14 79.1% #5 2,260 4 63 1976 7–8 46.7% — 1,629 0 4
24 1976 57–6 90.5% #2 2,436 5 70 1977 2–2 50.0% — 1,634 0 4
25 1977 20–1 95.2% — 2,446 6 74 1978 10–5 66.7% — 1,633 0 4
26 1978 47–9 83.9% #3 2,400 6 80 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,621 0 4
27 1979 53–11 82.8% #4 2,387 6 84 1980 1–2 33.3% — 1,590 0 4
28 1980 38–19 66.7% #5 2,215 7 85 — — — — — — —
29 1981 5–3 62.5% — 2,188 7 85 — — — — — — —
30 1982 6–6 50.0% — 2,086 7 85 — — — — — — —
31 1983 9–7 56.2% — 1,968 7 85 — — — — — — —
33 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,938 7 85 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Evonne Goolagong Nathalie Fuchs
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1968 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 1970 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1970 — — — — 46 9 55 83.6% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 1971 — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 1971 8 2 10 80.0% 34 3 37 91.9% 36 5 41 87.8% 16 5 21 76.2% 1972 — — — — 13 10 23 56.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1972 6 0 6 100.0% 33 3 36 91.7% 47 6 53 88.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 1973 4 3 7 57.1% 14 11 25 56.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
21 1973 8 2 10 80.0% 57 7 64 89.1% 36 5 41 87.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 1974 2 1 3 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 14 3 17 82.4% 37 5 42 88.1% 10 1 11 90.9% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 1975 2 1 3 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 21 3 24 87.5% 22 7 29 75.9% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1976 1 1 2 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 2 15 86.7% 38 2 40 95.0% 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
25 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 20 0 20 100.0% — — — — 1978 — — — — 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — —
26 1978 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 26 5 31 83.9% 1979 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1979 14 3 17 82.4% 14 5 19 73.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 8 1 9 88.9% 1980 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1980 2 1 3 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 11 2 13 84.6% 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1981 — — — — — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 45 16 61 73.8% 235 48 283 83.0% 306 58 364 84.1% 146 37 183 79.8% — 6 6 12 50.0% 66 57 123 53.7% 8 22 30 26.7% 12 12 24 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Evonne Goolagong Nathalie Fuchs
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1968 1579 113.7 — — — — — +22 -16 65.5% +1.31 2–1 (67%) — — +0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1969 1631 119.0 — — — — — +3 -2 62.2% +0.87 1–2 (33%) — — +2.49 1970 1489 103.7 — — — — — +24 — 25.0% -1.50 — — — +0.36
18 1970 2002 148.5 — — — — — +43 -34 73.1% +1.82 18–4 (82%) — — -2.81 1971 1528 111.5 — — — — — +20 +25 38.1% -1.33 1–0 0–1 — 0.00
19 1971 2177 163.9 — — — — -178 +39 +100 80.0% +2.29 19–8 (70%) 9–4 (69%) 110.4 -4.23 1972 1626 127.8 — — — — -89 +40 -84 51.1% +0.14 5–5 (50%) 1–0 — +2.57
20 1972 2245 167.1 — — — — -99 +89 +77 85.6% +2.86 10–4 (71%) 8–4 (67%) 103.9 -4.28 1973 1683 125.2 — — — — -46 -23 -123 50.0% -0.10 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 +5.03
21 1973 2299 171.3 — — — — -145 +134 +109 83.3% +2.75 13–5 (72%) 9–5 (64%) 102.6 -6.12 1974 1772 129.2 — — — — -57 -3 -252 55.7% +0.37 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -0.31
22 1974 2351 167.4 — — — — -72 +43 +91 78.5% +2.12 17–7 (71%) 11–5 (69%) 104.6 -5.92 1975 1631 121.5 — — — — — +21 — 42.9% -0.46 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 97.9 -0.41
23 1975 2261 167.4 — — — — -54 +112 +127 74.1% +1.80 10–5 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -5.65 1976 1629 120.9 — — — — — +34 — 50.0% +0.37 1–1 1–0 — +1.16
24 1976 2436 178.6 — — — — +145 -77 -22 86.5% +2.94 6–1 (86%) 5–3 (63%) 106.2 -6.86 1977 1635 106.0 — — — — +67 — — 55.6% +0.11 0–1 1–0 — +0.66
25 1977 2447 165.4 — — — — — — +85 87.2% +3.19 4–1 (80%) 1–0 — -0.55 1978 1633 112.6 — — — — — +28 — 64.3% +1.00 — 1–1 — +2.09
26 1978 2400 169.9 — — — — +62 — +135 81.4% +2.45 7–2 (78%) 9–4 (69%) 102.4 -1.73 1979 1622 99.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.67 0–1 — — -0.01
27 1979 2388 168.5 — — — — +66 -113 +142 80.0% +2.27 11–2 (85%) 4–3 (57%) 100.8 -4.29 1980 1591 95.4 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 — — +0.40
28 1980 2215 171.5 — — — — +110 +2 +349 66.9% +1.37 5–7 (42%) 6–7 (46%) 90.5 -5.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1981 2188 131.2 — — — — — — +292 58.8% +0.35 1–0 1–0 — -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1982 2087 128.7 — — — — — — +197 53.6% +0.25 3–3 (50%) 1–0 — -1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1983 1968 127.4 — — — — — +111 — 51.4% +0.14 3–0 (100%) 1–0 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1985 1939 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2482 169.9 — — — — +9 +59 +94 77.8% +2.19 130–52 (71%) 71–38 (65%) 111.0 -5.27 — 1783 127.4 — — — — -44 +14 -109 49.8% -0.04 25–19 (57%) 7–10 (41%) 100.8 +5.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.