H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Evonne Goolagong vs Pam Shriver H2H: 2-1

Evonne Goolagong holds a 2–1 lead over Pam Shriver in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Evonne Goolagong leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1983 WTA Finals round of 16 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Evonne Goolagong
AUS Age 75 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Shriver 6-1 6-3 Evonne Goolagong Match data Mar 23, 1983 R16 WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Evonne Goolagong 6-3 6-2 Pam Shriver Match data Jun 10, 1979* F Beckenham WTA 250 Grass
Evonne Goolagong 6-4 7-5 Pam Shriver Match data Mar 11, 1978* SF Dallas WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Evonne Goolagong #85 #1 — 2,481 736 159 82.2% 7 0 2 8 68 85
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Evonne Goolagong Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1
16 1968 9–4 69.2% — 1,578 0 1 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1
17 1969 13–8 61.9% — 1,631 0 3 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2
18 1970 74–19 79.6% — 2,001 0 13 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4
19 1971 94–15 86.2% — 2,177 2 26 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5
20 1972 89–10 89.9% — 2,244 2 39 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8
21 1973 105–15 87.5% — 2,298 2 51 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1974 64–11 85.3% — 2,351 3 59 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14
23 1975 53–14 79.1% #5 2,260 4 63 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16
24 1976 57–6 90.5% #2 2,436 5 70 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20
25 1977 20–1 95.2% — 2,446 6 74 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24
26 1978 47–9 83.9% #3 2,400 6 80 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24
27 1979 53–11 82.8% #4 2,387 6 84 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24
28 1980 38–19 66.7% #5 2,215 7 85 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24
29 1981 5–3 62.5% — 2,188 7 85 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24
30 1982 6–6 50.0% — 2,086 7 85 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 1983 9–7 56.2% — 1,968 7 85 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 — — — — — — — 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,938 7 85 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 — — — — — — — 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Evonne Goolagong Pam Shriver
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3%
16 1968 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
17 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3%
18 1970 — — — — 46 9 55 83.6% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5%
19 1971 8 2 10 80.0% 34 3 37 91.9% 36 5 41 87.8% 16 5 21 76.2% 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7%
20 1972 6 0 6 100.0% 33 3 36 91.7% 47 6 53 88.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4%
21 1973 8 2 10 80.0% 57 7 64 89.1% 36 5 41 87.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0%
22 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 14 3 17 82.4% 37 5 42 88.1% 10 1 11 90.9% 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6%
23 1975 2 1 3 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 21 3 24 87.5% 22 7 29 75.9% 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9%
24 1976 1 1 2 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 2 15 86.7% 38 2 40 95.0% 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3%
25 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 20 0 20 100.0% — — — — 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2%
26 1978 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 26 5 31 83.9% 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1979 14 3 17 82.4% 14 5 19 73.7% 17 2 19 89.5% 8 1 9 88.9% 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4%
28 1980 2 1 3 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 11 2 13 84.6% 19 13 32 59.4% 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 1981 — — — — — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
30 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
31 1983 — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 45 16 61 73.8% 235 48 283 83.0% 306 58 364 84.1% 146 37 183 79.8% — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Evonne Goolagong Pam Shriver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06
16 1968 1579 113.7 — — — — — +22 -16 65.5% +1.31 2–1 (67%) — — +0.86 1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83
17 1969 1631 119.0 — — — — — +3 -2 62.2% +0.87 1–2 (33%) — — +2.49 1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03
18 1970 2002 148.5 — — — — — +43 -34 73.1% +1.82 18–4 (82%) — — -2.81 1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74
19 1971 2177 163.9 — — — — -178 +39 +100 80.0% +2.29 19–8 (70%) 9–4 (69%) 110.4 -4.23 1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82
20 1972 2245 167.1 — — — — -99 +89 +77 85.6% +2.86 10–4 (71%) 8–4 (67%) 103.9 -4.28 1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79
21 1973 2299 171.3 — — — — -145 +134 +109 83.3% +2.75 13–5 (72%) 9–5 (64%) 102.6 -6.12 1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74
22 1974 2351 167.4 — — — — -72 +43 +91 78.5% +2.12 17–7 (71%) 11–5 (69%) 104.6 -5.92 1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23
23 1975 2261 167.4 — — — — -54 +112 +127 74.1% +1.80 10–5 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -5.65 1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63
24 1976 2436 178.6 — — — — +145 -77 -22 86.5% +2.94 6–1 (86%) 5–3 (63%) 106.2 -6.86 1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44
25 1977 2447 165.4 — — — — — — +85 87.2% +3.19 4–1 (80%) 1–0 — -0.55 1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71
26 1978 2400 169.9 — — — — +62 — +135 81.4% +2.45 7–2 (78%) 9–4 (69%) 102.4 -1.73 1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34
27 1979 2388 168.5 — — — — +66 -113 +142 80.0% +2.27 11–2 (85%) 4–3 (57%) 100.8 -4.29 1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41
28 1980 2215 171.5 — — — — +110 +2 +349 66.9% +1.37 5–7 (42%) 6–7 (46%) 90.5 -5.70 1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30
29 1981 2188 131.2 — — — — — — +292 58.8% +0.35 1–0 1–0 — -0.64 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50
30 1982 2087 128.7 — — — — — — +197 53.6% +0.25 3–3 (50%) 1–0 — -1.16 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73
31 1983 1968 127.4 — — — — — +111 — 51.4% +0.14 3–0 (100%) 1–0 — +0.01 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26
33 1985 1939 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.09 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20
Career — 2482 169.9 — — — — +9 +59 +94 77.8% +2.19 130–52 (71%) 71–38 (65%) 111.0 -5.27 — 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.