H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Evonne Goolagong vs Pam Shriver H2H: 2-1

Evonne Goolagong holds a 2–1 lead over Pam Shriver in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Evonne Goolagong leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1983 Virginia Slims Championships fourth round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Evonne Goolagong
AUS Age 74 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 23, 1983 Virginia Slims Championships WTA Finals R16 Carpet Pam Shriver 6-1 6-3 Evonne Goolagong Match data
Jun 10, 1979* Beckenham WTA 250 F Grass Evonne Goolagong 6-3 6-2 Pam Shriver Match data
Mar 11, 1978* Dallas WTA 250 SF Carpet Evonne Goolagong 6-4 7-5 Pam Shriver Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Evonne Goolagong #85 #35 — 2,471 735 158 82.3% 7 2 1 8 66 84
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Evonne Goolagong Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1
16 1968 9–4 69.2% — 1,578 0 1 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1
17 1969 13–8 61.9% — 1,630 0 3 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2
18 1970 74–19 79.6% — 1,999 0 13 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4
19 1971 96–16 85.7% — 2,174 2 26 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5
20 1972 89–10 89.9% — 2,238 2 38 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8
21 1973 102–14 87.9% — 2,297 2 50 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1974 64–11 85.3% — 2,326 3 58 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14
23 1975 53–13 80.3% — 2,265 4 62 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16
24 1976 57–6 90.5% — 2,425 5 69 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20
25 1977 20–1 95.2% — 2,435 6 73 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24
26 1978 47–9 83.9% — 2,353 6 79 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24
27 1979 53–11 82.8% — 2,314 6 83 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24
28 1980 38–19 66.7% — 2,165 7 84 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24
29 1981 5–3 62.5% — 2,144 7 84 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24
30 1982 6–6 50.0% — 2,052 7 84 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 1983 9–7 56.2% — 1,943 7 84 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 — — — — — — — 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,914 7 84 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 — — — — — — — 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24