H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Fabiola Zuluaga vs Emilie Loit H2H: 2-0
Fabiola Zuluaga holds a 2–0 lead over Emilie Loit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fabiola Zuluaga leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Fabiola Zuluaga won the 2003 Roland Garros second round 7-6(6) 1-6 9-7.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 47
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 47
Left-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2003* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Fabiola Zuluaga | 7-6(6) 1-6 9-7 | Emilie Loit | Match data |
| May 25, 2002* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Fabiola Zuluaga | 4-6 6-0 7-5 | Emilie Loit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabiola Zuluaga | #85 | #16 | 1,362 | 1,856 | 113 | 97 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Emilie Loit | #161 | #27 | 1,016 | 1,780 | 162 | 180 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fabiola Zuluaga | Emilie Loit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #87 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #96 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #51 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #101 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #95 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #75 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #38 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,746 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #45 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2005 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #85 | 1,683 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #56 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #43 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,513 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 |