H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Fabiola Zuluaga vs Iroda Tulyaganova H2H: 1-0
Fabiola Zuluaga holds a 1–0 lead over Iroda Tulyaganova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fabiola Zuluaga leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fabiola Zuluaga won the 2002 Montreal second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 47
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 44
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2002* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Fabiola Zuluaga | 6-1 6-2 | Iroda Tulyaganova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabiola Zuluaga | #85 | #16 | 1,362 | 1,856 | 113 | 97 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Iroda Tulyaganova | #862 | #16 | 1,349 | 1,820 | 93 | 80 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fabiola Zuluaga | Iroda Tulyaganova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #75 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1998 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #87 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #20 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1999 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #51 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2000 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #39 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #50 | 1,734 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #550 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2002 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #75 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #371 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2003 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #38 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #131 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2004 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,746 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2005 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #85 | 1,683 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |