H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Fang Li vs Alexia Dechaume Balleret H2H: 3-0

Fang Li holds a 3–0 lead over Alexia Dechaume Balleret in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Fang Li leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fang Li won the 1999 Key Biscayne round of 128 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fang Li
CHN Age 53 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Alexia Dechaume Balleret
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fang Li #43 7-6 6-3 Alexia Dechaume Balleret Match data Mar 19, 1999* R128 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Fang Li #42 6-3 7-5 Alexia Dechaume Balleret Match data Aug 19, 1998* R64 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Fang Li #67 6-2 6-3 Alexia Dechaume Balleret Match data Jan 12, 1995* R32 Hobart International Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fang Li #488 #36 723 1,707 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Alexia Dechaume Balleret — — — 1,738 127 181 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fang Li Alexia Dechaume Balleret
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1986 1–1 50.0% — 1,516 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1987 6–10 37.5% — 1,539 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1988 7–13 35.0% — 1,532 0 0
19 1992 5–8 38.5% #119 1,543 0 0 1989 5–14 26.3% — 1,491 0 0
20 1993 6–12 33.3% #132 1,529 0 0 1990 13–11 54.2% — 1,600 0 0
21 1994 13–13 50.0% #67 1,608 0 0 1991 14–18 43.8% — 1,645 0 0
22 1995 9–8 52.9% #93 1,622 0 0 1992 21–19 52.5% — 1,733 0 0
23 1996 3–5 37.5% #199 1,591 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,710 0 0
24 1997 2–3 40.0% #69 1,599 0 0 1994 12–13 48.0% — 1,704 0 0
25 1998 23–24 48.9% #40 1,676 0 0 1995 6–15 28.6% — 1,585 0 0
26 1999 6–12 33.3% #86 1,585 0 0 1996 7–13 35.0% — 1,576 0 0
27 2000 0–2 0.0% #503 1,542 0 0 1997 15–15 50.0% — 1,620 0 0
28 2001 0–3 0.0% #488 1,500 0 0 1998 9–19 32.1% — 1,592 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1999 11–18 37.9% — 1,571 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% — 1,555 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fang Li Alexia Dechaume Balleret
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
19 1992 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1989 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — — — — —
20 1993 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1994 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1991 10 11 21 47.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 1995 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 12 11 23 52.2% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1996 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 7 8 15 46.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1998 12 12 24 50.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 5 9 14 35.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1996 3 7 10 30.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2000 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 9 8 17 52.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2001 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 3 9 12 25.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 46 55 101 45.5% 17 21 38 44.7% 1 7 8 12.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — 59 86 145 40.7% 51 67 118 43.2% 10 16 26 38.5% 7 12 19 36.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fang Li Alexia Dechaume Balleret
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1517 105.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.01
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1539 124.4 — — — — +28 +26 — 42.1% 0.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — +1.23
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1532 116.8 — — — — — +56 +5 40.0% -1.02 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — +0.04
19 1992 1544 119.3 — — — — +55 — — 39.3% -0.68 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.13 1989 1492 117.1 — — — — -9 +59 — 36.4% -1.11 0–6 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 92.8 +0.68
20 1993 1529 112.6 — — — — +30 +31 — 33.3% -1.36 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.54 1990 1601 116.0 — — — — -64 -22 -5 51.7% -0.12 6–4 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 108.0 +1.41
21 1994 1609 120.8 — — — — -10 +8 — 49.2% -0.22 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) 101.0 +0.90 1991 1645 125.3 — — — — -25 -89 -62 49.3% +0.04 1–8 (11%) 1–1 — -0.53
22 1995 1623 122.6 — — — — -4 — — 55.3% +0.32 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.34 1992 1733 139.7 — — — — -43 -63 — 52.2% +0.31 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 101.1 -0.96
23 1996 1592 112.9 — — — — +22 — — 38.1% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.31 1993 1710 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — 0.00
24 1997 1600 118.4 — — — — +20 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.54 1994 1705 133.1 — — — — -51 +24 — 51.9% +0.11 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.41
25 1998 1676 134.1 — — — — +38 -58 — 49.0% -0.06 6–4 (60%) 6–2 (75%) 107.9 +1.15 1995 1585 113.1 — — — — +35 +34 — 22.5% -1.58 1–1 0–2 — -0.50
26 1999 1586 117.9 — — — — +101 -16 — 37.8% -0.59 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.9 -0.13 1996 1576 120.4 — — — — +9 +78 — 35.7% -1.19 1–3 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 100.2 -0.64
27 2000 1542 89.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — +0.39 1997 1621 127.1 — — — — +3 +66 — 52.8% -0.01 4–8 (33%) 3–5 (38%) 95.3 +0.82
28 2001 1500 92.6 — — — — +80 — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — 0.00 1998 1592 121.9 — — — — -25 +71 +3 36.8% -0.87 5–7 (42%) 3–5 (38%) 98.4 -1.11
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1572 115.6 — — — — +3 +13 +1 40.9% -0.94 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) 98.3 -0.59
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1556 89.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.12
Career — 1707 127.8 — — — — +28 -30 — 44.1% -0.42 22–21 (51%) 14–15 (48%) 100.5 +1.98 — 1739 130.0 — — — — -16 +20 -8 44.0% -0.45 32–62 (34%) 28–29 (49%) 94.0 +0.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.