H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Fang Li vs Alexia Dechaume Balleret H2H: 3-0
Fang Li holds a 3–0 lead over Alexia Dechaume Balleret in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Fang Li leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fang Li won the 1999 Key Biscayne first round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 1999* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Fang Li | 7-6 6-3 | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | Match data |
| Aug 19, 1998* | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Fang Li | 6-3 7-5 | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | Match data |
| Jan 12, 1995* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Fang Li | 6-2 6-3 | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fang Li | #488 | #36 | 723 | 1,705 | 67 | 89 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alexia Dechaume Balleret | — | — | — | 1,739 | 127 | 181 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Fang Li | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #503 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #488 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |