H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Fang Li vs Pam Shriver H2H: 1-1

Fang Li and Pam Shriver are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fang Li leads 1–0 on carpet, while Pam Shriver leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1994 China Open quarterfinal 4-6 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fang Li
CHN Age 53 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Shriver #54 4-6 7-5 6-1 Fang Li #100 Match data Feb 19, 1994* QF China Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Fang Li #119 6-3 (ret.) Pam Shriver #46 Match data Feb 11, 1994* R32 Japan Women's Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fang Li #488 #36 723 1,707 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fang Li Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2
18 — — — — — — — 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4
19 1992 5–8 38.5% #119 1,543 0 0 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5
20 1993 6–12 33.3% #132 1,529 0 0 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8
21 1994 13–13 50.0% #67 1,608 0 0 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1995 9–8 52.9% #93 1,622 0 0 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14
23 1996 3–5 37.5% #199 1,591 0 0 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16
24 1997 2–3 40.0% #69 1,599 0 0 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20
25 1998 23–24 48.9% #40 1,676 0 0 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24
26 1999 6–12 33.3% #86 1,585 0 0 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24
27 2000 0–2 0.0% #503 1,542 0 0 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24
28 2001 0–3 0.0% #488 1,500 0 0 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24
29 — — — — — — — 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24
30 — — — — — — — 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 — — — — — — — 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 — — — — — — — 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 — — — — — — — 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 — — — — — — — 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fang Li Pam Shriver
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5%
19 1992 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7%
20 1993 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4%
21 1994 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0%
22 1995 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6%
23 1996 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9%
24 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3%
25 1998 12 12 24 50.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2%
26 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 2000 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4%
28 2001 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 46 55 101 45.5% 17 21 38 44.7% 1 7 8 12.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fang Li Pam Shriver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74
19 1992 1544 119.3 — — — — +55 — — 39.3% -0.68 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.13 1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82
20 1993 1529 112.6 — — — — +30 +31 — 33.3% -1.36 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.54 1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79
21 1994 1609 120.8 — — — — -10 +8 — 49.2% -0.22 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) 101.0 +0.90 1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74
22 1995 1623 122.6 — — — — -4 — — 55.3% +0.32 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.34 1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23
23 1996 1592 112.9 — — — — +22 — — 38.1% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.31 1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63
24 1997 1600 118.4 — — — — +20 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.54 1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44
25 1998 1676 134.1 — — — — +38 -58 — 49.0% -0.06 6–4 (60%) 6–2 (75%) 107.9 +1.15 1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71
26 1999 1586 117.9 — — — — +101 -16 — 37.8% -0.59 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.9 -0.13 1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34
27 2000 1542 89.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — +0.39 1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41
28 2001 1500 92.6 — — — — +80 — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — 0.00 1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20
Career — 1707 127.8 — — — — +28 -30 — 44.1% -0.42 22–21 (51%) 14–15 (48%) 100.5 +1.98 — 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.