H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Fay Toyne vs Almut Sturm H2H: 2-1
Fay Toyne holds a 2–1 lead over Almut Sturm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Fay Toyne leads 2–0 on clay, while Almut Sturm leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Fay Toyne won the 1970 Hamburg third round 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 1970* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Fay Toyne | 7-5 6-0 | Almut Sturm | Match data |
| Jan 24, 1969* | Cologne | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Almut Sturm | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | Fay Toyne | Match data |
| May 25, 1968* | Brussels | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Fay Toyne | 6-3 6-4 | Almut Sturm | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fay Toyne | — | — | — | 1,716 | 73 | 66 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Almut Sturm | — | — | — | 1,635 | 45 | 63 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fay Toyne | Almut Sturm | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | 1968 | 36–16 | 69.2% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1969 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1970 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1971 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1972 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 2 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 2 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 2 |