H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Faye Urban vs Alice Tym H2H: 2-0

Faye Urban holds a 2–0 lead over Alice Tym in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Faye Urban leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Faye Urban won the 1968 Miami Open semifinal 3-6 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Faye Urban
CAN
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Alice Tym
USA Age 83

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Faye Urban 3-6 6-1 6-0 Alice Tym Match data Feb 3, 1968* SF Miami Open WTA 1000 Clay
Faye Urban 6-2 6-1 Alice Tym Match data Jan 28, 1968* F Fort Lauderdale WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Faye Urban — — — 1,658 38 29 56.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Alice Tym — — — 1,678 62 41 60.2% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Faye Urban Alice Tym
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 1968 24–15 61.5% — 1,621 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1969 14–14 50.0% — 1,631 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — 1968 35–21 62.5% — 1,627 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1969 18–14 56.2% — 1,585 0 5
27 — — — — — — — 1970 9–4 69.2% — 1,634 0 7
28 — — — — — — — 1971 0–2 0.0% — 1,600 0 7

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Faye Urban Alice Tym
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
22 1968 1621 120.8 — — — — -126 +24 -86 63.3% +1.23 3–4 (43%) — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1969 1632 120.0 — — — — -29 -22 -67 51.7% +0.25 1–5 (17%) — — +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1628 123.7 — — — — -102 +117 -106 59.5% +0.75 9–5 (64%) — — +0.30
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1586 111.7 — — — — — +57 -64 54.3% +0.46 6–2 (75%) — — +2.49
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1635 119.0 — — — — — — +53 63.3% +1.17 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +3.01
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1600 96.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.36
Career — 1658 120.4 — — — — -72 +10 -75 58.3% +0.81 4–9 (31%) — — +1.22 — 1679 120.0 — — — — -102 +101 -13 57.4% +0.65 18–8 (69%) 1–0 — +5.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.