H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Fiorella Bonicelli vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 0-1
Patricia Medrado holds a 1–0 lead over Fiorella Bonicelli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patricia Medrado leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Patricia Medrado won the 1982 Monte Carlo third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 1982* | Monte Carlo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Patricia Medrado | 6-4 6-2 | Fiorella Bonicelli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiorella Bonicelli | — | — | — | 1,866 | 135 | 97 | 58.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Patricia Medrado | #359 | #67 | 9 | 1,837 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fiorella Bonicelli | Patricia Medrado | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1971 | 12–10 | 54.5% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1972 | 26–16 | 61.9% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 9 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1973 | 24–11 | 68.6% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 11 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1974 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 11 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1975 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 12 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1976 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 12 | 1981 | 38–20 | 65.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1977 | 9–10 | 47.4% | — | 1,763 | 0 | 12 | 1982 | 33–25 | 56.9% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1978 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 12 | 1983 | 4–18 | 18.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,542 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,562 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 12 | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,474 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |