H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Fiorella Bonicelli vs Raquel Giscafre H2H: 4-1
Fiorella Bonicelli holds a 4–1 lead over Raquel Giscafre in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Fiorella Bonicelli leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Fiorella Bonicelli won the 1975 Istanbul semifinal 6-1 1-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 1975* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Fiorella Bonicelli | 6-1 1-6 6-0 | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
| May 29, 1975* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Fiorella Bonicelli | 6-4 6-2 | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
| May 22, 1975* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Raquel Giscafre | 5-7 6-2 1-0 (ret.) | Fiorella Bonicelli | Match data |
| Nov 23, 1973* | Buenos Aires | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Fiorella Bonicelli | 6-4 7-5 | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
| Oct 31, 1972* | Ecuador | WTA 250 | SF | — | Fiorella Bonicelli | 6-4 7-5 | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiorella Bonicelli | — | — | — | 1,866 | 135 | 97 | 58.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Raquel Giscafre | — | — | — | 1,797 | 86 | 120 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fiorella Bonicelli | Raquel Giscafre | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 12–10 | 54.5% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 6 | 1968 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1972 | 26–16 | 61.9% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 9 | 1969 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1973 | 24–11 | 68.6% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 11 | 1970 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1974 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 11 | 1971 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1975 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 12 | 1972 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1976 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 12 | 1973 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1977 | 9–10 | 47.4% | — | 1,763 | 0 | 12 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1978 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 12 | 1975 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 12 | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |