H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Flavia Pennetta vs Anna-Lena Groenefeld H2H: 1-1
Flavia Pennetta and Anna-Lena Groenefeld are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 1–0 on clay, while Flavia Pennetta leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Flavia Pennetta won the 2009 Linz fourth round 6-3 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2009* | Linz | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Flavia Pennetta | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
| Mar 5, 2006* | Acapulco | WTA 500 | F | Clay | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-1 4-6 6-2 | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flavia Pennetta | #15 | #6 | 3,621 | 1,982 | 418 | 272 | 60.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Flavia Pennetta | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #95 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #69 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #38 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #39 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #12 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #24 | 1,847 | 0 | 9 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #20 | 1,785 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #45 | 1,735 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #31 | 1,745 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #12 | 1,780 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #8 | 1,823 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |