H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Flavia Pennetta vs Chanelle Scheepers H2H: 1-1
Flavia Pennetta and Chanelle Scheepers are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Flavia Pennetta won the 2014 Cincinnati second round 6-3 6-7(3) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 42
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2014* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Flavia Pennetta | 6-3 6-7(3) 6-2 | Chanelle Scheepers | Match data |
| Aug 9, 2012* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Chanelle Scheepers | 1-4 (ret.) | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flavia Pennetta | #15 | #6 | 3,621 | 1,982 | 418 | 272 | 60.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| Chanelle Scheepers | #429 | #37 | 1,505 | 1,725 | 87 | 108 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Flavia Pennetta | Chanelle Scheepers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #95 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #69 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #38 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2005 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #39 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #103 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #12 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 | 2011 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #38 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #24 | 1,847 | 0 | 9 | 2012 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2011 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #20 | 1,785 | 0 | 9 | 2013 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #80 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2012 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #45 | 1,735 | 0 | 9 | 2014 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #77 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2013 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #31 | 1,745 | 0 | 9 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #424 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2014 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #12 | 1,780 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #8 | 1,823 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |