H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Flavia Pennetta vs Daniela Hantuchova H2H: 4-2

Flavia Pennetta holds a 4–2 lead over Daniela Hantuchova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Flavia Pennetta leads 4–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Flavia Pennetta won the 2013 Tokyo second round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Flavia Pennetta
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Daniela Hantuchova
SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 25, 2013* Tokyo WTA 1000 R64 Hard Flavia Pennetta #32 6-3 6-3 Daniela Hantuchova #31 Match data
Oct 6, 2011* Beijing WTA 1000 R32 Hard Flavia Pennetta #26 6-2 6-1 Daniela Hantuchova #25 Match data
Aug 18, 2011* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R32 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #23 6-3 6-4 Flavia Pennetta #25 Match data
Aug 18, 2010* Montreal WTA 1000 R64 Hard Flavia Pennetta #20 6-0 7-5 Daniela Hantuchova #28 Match data
Aug 15, 2009* Cincinnati WTA 1000 QF Hard Flavia Pennetta #12 6-3 6-3 Daniela Hantuchova #27 Match data
Oct 8, 2005* Filderstadt WTA 500 QF Hard Daniela Hantuchova #20 6-3 6-4 Flavia Pennetta #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Flavia Pennetta #15 #6 3,621 1,982 418 272 60.6% 1 1 0 6 3 11
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 457 361 55.9% 0 2 0 1 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Flavia Pennetta Daniela Hantuchova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,551 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1
20 2002 1–3 25.0% #95 1,482 0 0 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,753 0 1
21 2003 18–20 47.4% #69 1,559 0 0 2004 24–24 50.0% #31 1,714 0 1
22 2004 30–22 57.7% #38 1,670 0 1 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,877 0 1
23 2005 37–21 63.8% #23 1,777 0 3 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,860 0 1
24 2006 29–18 61.7% #28 1,729 0 3 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,930 0 3
25 2007 30–24 55.6% #39 1,768 0 4 2008 21–19 52.5% #21 1,756 0 3
26 2008 50–23 68.5% #13 1,900 0 6 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,807 0 3
27 2009 52–23 69.3% #12 1,902 0 8 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,780 0 3
28 2010 45–23 66.2% #24 1,847 0 9 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,790 0 4
29 2011 31–22 58.5% #20 1,785 0 9 2012 22–22 50.0% #32 1,686 0 5
30 2012 19–13 59.4% #45 1,735 0 9 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6
31 2013 19–20 48.7% #31 1,745 0 9 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,577 0 6
32 2014 30–20 60.0% #12 1,780 0 10 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,574 0 7
33 2015 27–20 57.4% #8 1,823 1 11 2016 1–8 11.1% #228 1,514 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,524 0 7