H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Flavia Pennetta vs Emma Laine H2H: 0-1
Emma Laine holds a 1–0 lead over Flavia Pennetta in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emma Laine leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emma Laine won the 2006 Indian Wells third round 1-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FIN
Age 40
Left-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2006* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Emma Laine | 1-0 (ret.) | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flavia Pennetta | #15 | #6 | 3,621 | 1,982 | 418 | 272 | 60.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| Emma Laine | #1,001 | #50 | 429 | 1,578 | 21 | 38 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Flavia Pennetta | Emma Laine | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #843 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #870 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #95 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #74 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #69 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #247 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #38 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #399 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2007 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #39 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2008 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #12 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2010 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #24 | 1,847 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2011 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #20 | 1,785 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #45 | 1,735 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #31 | 1,745 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #12 | 1,780 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #8 | 1,823 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |