H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Florencia Labat vs Pam Shriver H2H: 1-1

Florencia Labat and Pam Shriver are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 1–0 on carpet, while Florencia Labat leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Florencia Labat won the 1994 Wimbledon round of 32 6-4 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Florencia Labat
ARG Age 55 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Florencia Labat #33 6-4 4-6 6-2 Pam Shriver #53 Match data Jun 26, 1994* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Pam Shriver #13 6-3 6-0 Florencia Labat #85 Match data Nov 3, 1989* R16 Worcester WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Florencia Labat #106 #26 733 1,867 191 184 50.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Florencia Labat Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2
18 1989 8–8 50.0% #77 1,546 0 0 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4
19 1990 12–18 40.0% #100 1,572 0 0 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5
20 1991 19–17 52.8% #60 1,671 0 0 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8
21 1992 18–17 51.4% #52 1,729 0 0 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1993 21–16 56.8% #51 1,762 0 0 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14
23 1994 27–15 64.3% #38 1,787 0 0 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16
24 1995 16–13 55.2% #55 1,780 0 0 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20
25 1996 25–18 58.1% #42 1,771 0 0 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24
26 1997 21–25 45.7% #39 1,674 0 0 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24
27 1998 13–20 39.4% #64 1,655 0 0 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24
28 1999 3–6 33.3% #117 1,620 0 0 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24
29 2000 8–10 44.4% #106 1,609 0 0 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24
30 — — — — — — — 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 — — — — — — — 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 — — — — — — — 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 — — — — — — — 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 — — — — — — — 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Florencia Labat Pam Shriver
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1986 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3%
18 1989 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5%
19 1990 4 6 10 40.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7%
20 1991 8 7 15 53.3% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — — — — — 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4%
21 1992 9 5 14 64.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0%
22 1993 5 6 11 45.5% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6%
23 1994 24 12 36 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9%
24 1995 11 8 19 57.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3%
25 1996 19 11 30 63.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2%
26 1997 10 10 20 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1998 8 7 15 53.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4%
28 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 2000 2 5 7 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 106 84 190 55.8% 66 73 139 47.5% 12 12 24 50.0% 7 15 22 31.8% — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Florencia Labat Pam Shriver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1986 1483 97.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.18 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03
18 1989 1546 110.9 — — — — +37 +1 — 47.4% -0.61 4–2 (67%) 5–0 (100%) 105.8 +1.52 1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74
19 1990 1573 118.7 — — — — +20 -15 — 42.5% -0.55 6–7 (46%) 6–2 (75%) 104.5 +1.08 1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82
20 1991 1671 134.2 — — — — -10 -1 — 48.8% -0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 106.9 -0.64 1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79
21 1992 1730 132.2 — — — — +20 -68 — 50.6% +0.11 6–7 (46%) 0–1 — +0.14 1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74
22 1993 1762 141.4 — — — — -20 +7 -160 56.0% +0.68 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 100.9 -1.64 1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23
23 1994 1788 139.9 — — — — -25 — -123 58.3% +0.54 10–4 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 106.0 -0.06 1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63
24 1995 1781 133.7 — — — — -26 +8 — 50.8% +0.17 6–3 (67%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.32 1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44
25 1996 1772 142.8 — — — — +32 -66 -49 57.0% +0.70 9–7 (56%) 4–4 (50%) 98.7 +0.20 1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71
26 1997 1675 134.1 — — — — +5 +54 +73 48.1% -0.17 4–8 (33%) 6–4 (60%) 96.2 +1.02 1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34
27 1998 1656 126.6 — — — — +51 -6 +31 40.8% -0.83 5–5 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.2 +0.12 1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41
28 1999 1620 118.4 — — — — +82 -10 — 35.0% -1.25 1–1 — — -0.60 1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30
29 2000 1609 110.7 — — — — +27 +28 — 45.2% -0.74 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 102.8 +0.45 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20
Career — 1868 138.5 — — — — +9 -5 -37 49.9% -0.02 67–55 (55%) 38–29 (57%) 106.9 +0.39 — 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.