H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francesca Schiavone vs Amélie Mauresmo H2H: 3-3

Francesca Schiavone and Amélie Mauresmo are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Amélie Mauresmo leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Francesca Schiavone won the 2009 Toronto second round 6-2 3-6 6-1.

ITA Age 46 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 19, 2009* Toronto WTA 1000 R64 Hard Francesca Schiavone #27 6-2 3-6 6-1 Amélie Mauresmo #16 Match data
Oct 14, 2005* Moscow WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Francesca Schiavone #22 6-1 6-1 Amélie Mauresmo #4 Match data
Sep 7, 2004* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Amélie Mauresmo #2 6-4 6-2 Francesca Schiavone #17 Match data
May 1, 2004* Warsaw WTA 500 QF Clay Francesca Schiavone #22 3-6 7-6(2) 6-1 Amélie Mauresmo #3 Match data
Jan 17, 2004* Sydney WTA 500 SF Hard Amélie Mauresmo #4 6-3 7-6(2) Francesca Schiavone #21 Match data
Feb 10, 2002* Paris WTA 500 QF Carpet Amélie Mauresmo #8 6-2 6-2 Francesca Schiavone #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francesca Schiavone #486 #4 5,246 1,984 439 367 54.5% 1 0 0 3 4 8
Amélie Mauresmo #21 #1 4,992 2,217 458 183 71.5% 2 6 1 15 1 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francesca Schiavone Amélie Mauresmo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1995 0–1 0.0% #250 1,488 0 0
16 1996 2–2 50.0% #180 1,522 0 0
17 1997 4–6 40.0% #100 1,555 0 0
18 1998 20–18 52.6% #29 1,729 0 0
19 1999 0–1 0.0% #200 1,494 0 0 1999 32–14 69.6% #10 1,914 0 1
20 2000 7–4 63.6% #80 1,577 0 0 2000 26–12 68.4% #16 1,932 0 2
21 2001 26–22 54.2% #31 1,657 0 0 2001 43–12 78.2% #9 2,029 0 6
22 2002 20–22 47.6% #41 1,691 0 0 2002 45–15 75.0% #6 2,060 0 8
23 2003 32–23 58.2% #20 1,803 0 0 2003 45–17 72.6% #4 2,061 0 10
24 2004 32–22 59.3% #19 1,822 0 0 2004 56–11 83.6% #2 2,175 0 15
25 2005 39–21 65.0% #13 1,952 0 0 2005 53–16 76.8% #3 2,127 0 19
26 2006 35–23 60.3% #15 1,802 0 0 2006 50–14 78.1% #3 2,135 2 23
27 2007 27–22 55.1% #24 1,835 0 1 2007 27–14 65.9% #18 1,960 2 24
28 2008 22–21 51.2% #30 1,757 0 1 2008 30–19 61.2% #24 1,815 2 24
29 2009 35–25 58.3% #17 1,837 0 2 2009 25–12 67.6% #21 1,871 2 25
30 2010 38–21 64.4% #7 1,898 1 4
31 2011 34–21 61.8% #11 1,819 1 4
32 2012 20–21 48.8% #35 1,687 1 5
33 2013 25–24 51.0% #39 1,722 1 6
34 2014 14–25 35.9% #78 1,619 1 6
35 2015 9–17 34.6% #114 1,562 1 6
36 2016 13–13 50.0% #103 1,594 1 7
37 2017 11–14 44.0% #91 1,619 1 8
38 2018 0–5 0.0% #486 1,501 1 8