H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francesca Schiavone vs Nadia Petrova H2H: 4-2

Francesca Schiavone holds a 4–2 lead over Nadia Petrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Francesca Schiavone leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2008 Bali quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Francesca Schiavone
ITA Age 46 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 13, 2008* Bali WTA 500 QF Hard Nadia Petrova #22 6-4 6-3 Francesca Schiavone #28 Match data
Apr 9, 2006* Amelia Island WTA 500 F Clay Nadia Petrova #7 6-4 6-4 Francesca Schiavone #13 Match data
Oct 21, 2005* Zurich WTA 1000 R16 Hard Francesca Schiavone #18 3-6 6-2 7-6(3) Nadia Petrova #9 Match data
Oct 15, 2004* Moscow WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Francesca Schiavone #21 0-6 6-3 6-4 Nadia Petrova #13 Match data
Oct 4, 2001* Moscow WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Francesca Schiavone #40 6-4 6-2 Nadia Petrova #45 Match data
May 18, 2001* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Francesca Schiavone #72 7-5 6-4 Nadia Petrova #60 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francesca Schiavone #486 #4 5,246 1,984 439 367 54.5% 1 0 0 3 4 8
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francesca Schiavone Nadia Petrova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0
19 1999 0–1 0.0% #200 1,494 0 0 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0
20 2000 7–4 63.6% #80 1,577 0 0 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0
21 2001 26–22 54.2% #31 1,657 0 0 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0
22 2002 20–22 47.6% #41 1,691 0 0 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0
23 2003 32–23 58.2% #20 1,803 0 0 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1
24 2004 32–22 59.3% #19 1,822 0 0 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6
25 2005 39–21 65.0% #13 1,952 0 0 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7
26 2006 35–23 60.3% #15 1,802 0 0 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9
27 2007 27–22 55.1% #24 1,835 0 1 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9
28 2008 22–21 51.2% #30 1,757 0 1 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9
29 2009 35–25 58.3% #17 1,837 0 2 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10
30 2010 38–21 64.4% #7 1,898 1 4 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13
31 2011 34–21 61.8% #11 1,819 1 4 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13
32 2012 20–21 48.8% #35 1,687 1 5 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13
33 2013 25–24 51.0% #39 1,722 1 6 — — — — — — —
34 2014 14–25 35.9% #78 1,619 1 6 — — — — — — —
35 2015 9–17 34.6% #114 1,562 1 6 — — — — — — —
36 2016 13–13 50.0% #103 1,594 1 7 — — — — — — —
37 2017 11–14 44.0% #91 1,619 1 8 — — — — — — —
38 2018 0–5 0.0% #486 1,501 1 8 — — — — — — —