H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Francesca Schiavone vs Shahar Peer H2H: 1-4

Shahar Peer holds a 4–1 lead over Francesca Schiavone in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Shahar Peer leads 4–0 on hard courts, while Francesca Schiavone leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Shahar Peer won the 2011 Indian Wells fourth round 6-4 3-6 7-6(3).

ITA Age 46 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 4
5 main draw meetings
ISR Age 39 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 11, 2011* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Shahar Peer #12 6-4 3-6 7-6(3) Francesca Schiavone #5 Match data
Aug 20, 2009* Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard Shahar Peer #68 7-6(2) 6-4 Francesca Schiavone #27 Match data
Jul 16, 2009* Prague WTA 250 R32 Clay Francesca Schiavone #30 7-5 6-3 Shahar Peer #58 Match data
Oct 4, 2007* Stuttgart WTA 500 R32 Hard Shahar Peer #16 6-1 7-6(6) Francesca Schiavone #28 Match data
Sep 2, 2006* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Shahar Peer #21 6-3 6-7(3) 7-6(3) Francesca Schiavone #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Francesca Schiavone #486 #4 5,246 1,984 439 367 54.5% 1 0 0 3 4 8
Shahar Peer #1,185 #11 3,410 1,966 268 204 56.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Francesca Schiavone Shahar Peer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 3–3 50.0% #176 1,509 0 0
18 2005 22–20 52.4% #45 1,636 0 0
19 1999 0–1 0.0% #200 1,494 0 0 2006 38–20 65.5% #20 1,826 0 3
20 2000 7–4 63.6% #80 1,577 0 0 2007 39–21 65.0% #17 1,830 0 3
21 2001 26–22 54.2% #31 1,657 0 0 2008 24–20 54.5% #38 1,707 0 3
22 2002 20–22 47.6% #41 1,691 0 0 2009 36–21 63.2% #30 1,787 0 5
23 2003 32–23 58.2% #20 1,803 0 0 2010 47–21 69.1% #13 1,885 0 5
24 2004 32–22 59.3% #19 1,822 0 0 2011 23–21 52.3% #37 1,706 0 5
25 2005 39–21 65.0% #13 1,952 0 0 2012 15–22 40.5% #74 1,584 0 5
26 2006 35–23 60.3% #15 1,802 0 0 2013 10–14 41.7% #77 1,558 0 5
27 2007 27–22 55.1% #24 1,835 0 1 2014 10–18 35.7% #117 1,539 0 5
28 2008 22–21 51.2% #30 1,757 0 1 2015 1–3 25.0% #177 1,526 0 5
29 2009 35–25 58.3% #17 1,837 0 2
30 2010 38–21 64.4% #7 1,898 1 4
31 2011 34–21 61.8% #11 1,819 1 4
32 2012 20–21 48.8% #35 1,687 1 5
33 2013 25–24 51.0% #39 1,722 1 6
34 2014 14–25 35.9% #78 1,619 1 6
35 2015 9–17 34.6% #114 1,562 1 6
36 2016 13–13 50.0% #103 1,594 1 7
37 2017 11–14 44.0% #91 1,619 1 8
38 2018 0–5 0.0% #486 1,501 1 8