H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Francoise Durr vs Marita Redondo H2H: 1-3
Marita Redondo holds a 3–1 lead over Francoise Durr in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marita Redondo leads 2–1 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marita Redondo won the 1979 Seattle third round 3-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 83
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
Age 70
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 1979* | Seattle | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Marita Redondo | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Francoise Durr | Match data |
| Apr 12, 1976 | Virginia Slims Championships | WTA Finals | RR | Carpet | Marita Redondo | 6-1 6-3 | Francoise Durr | Match data |
| Feb 13, 1975* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Francoise Durr | 3-6 6-0 6-2 | Marita Redondo | Match data |
| Jun 21, 1973* | London Rothmans | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Marita Redondo | 6-4 6-2 | Francoise Durr | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francoise Durr | — | — | — | 2,144 | 373 | 235 | 61.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Marita Redondo | — | — | — | 1,905 | 136 | 118 | 53.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Francoise Durr | Marita Redondo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 24–4 | 85.7% | — | 1,807 | 0 | 7 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 29–16 | 64.4% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 8 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 8 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 16–17 | 48.5% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 19–17 | 52.8% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1968 | 20–10 | 66.7% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1969 | 37–18 | 67.3% | — | 1,816 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1970 | 47–26 | 64.4% | — | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1971 | 86–36 | 70.5% | — | 2,112 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1972 | 50–25 | 66.7% | — | 2,017 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1973 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 2,056 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1974 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 2,036 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1975 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1976 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,913 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1977 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1978 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1979 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |