H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Gabriela Sabatini vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 1-0
Gabriela Sabatini holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Medrado in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gabriela Sabatini leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gabriela Sabatini won the 1985 Hilton Head second round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 69
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 1985* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Gabriela Sabatini | 6-1 6-3 | Patricia Medrado | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gabriela Sabatini | #56 | #3 | 228 | 2,398 | 607 | 182 | 76.9% | 1 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 27 |
| Patricia Medrado | #359 | #67 | 9 | 1,837 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gabriela Sabatini | Patricia Medrado | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1984 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #74 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1985 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #12 | 1,947 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1986 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #9 | 2,023 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 62–16 | 79.5% | #6 | 2,264 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 61–13 | 82.4% | #4 | 2,276 | 0 | 9 | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,257 | 0 | 13 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 49–14 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,231 | 1 | 15 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1991 | 62–11 | 84.9% | #3 | 2,269 | 1 | 20 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 65–12 | 84.4% | #3 | 2,291 | 1 | 25 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #5 | 2,108 | 1 | 25 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1994 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 2,055 | 1 | 26 | 1981 | 38–20 | 65.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1995 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,062 | 1 | 27 | 1982 | 33–25 | 56.9% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1996 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #56 | 1,947 | 1 | 27 | 1983 | 4–18 | 18.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,542 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,562 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,474 | 0 | 10 |