H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Gail Sherriff vs Helen Gourlay H2H: 2-3
Helen Gourlay holds a 3–2 lead over Gail Sherriff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Helen Gourlay leads 2–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Helen Gourlay won the 1971 Newport Wales quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 1971* | Newport Wales | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Helen Gourlay | 6-4 6-3 | Gail Sherriff | Match data |
| May 31, 1971* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | QF | Clay | Helen Gourlay | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Gail Sherriff | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1971* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Gail Sherriff | 6-2 5-7 6-3 | Helen Gourlay | Match data |
| May 11, 1968* | Rome | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Helen Gourlay | 6-2 6-1 | Gail Sherriff | Match data |
| Mar 6, 1968* | Cairo | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Gail Sherriff | 6-2 2-6 6-0 | Helen Gourlay | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gail Sherriff | — | — | — | 1,978 | 342 | 145 | 70.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 41 |
| Helen Gourlay | — | — | — | 1,962 | 294 | 200 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gail Sherriff | Helen Gourlay | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 48–21 | 69.6% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 40–28 | 58.8% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1968 | 65–14 | 82.3% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 13 | 1970 | 42–22 | 65.6% | — | 1,842 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1969 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 17 | 1971 | 46–25 | 64.8% | — | 1,904 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1970 | 52–19 | 73.2% | — | 1,933 | 0 | 21 | 1972 | 34–25 | 57.6% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1971 | 49–20 | 71.0% | — | 1,921 | 0 | 23 | 1973 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1972 | 35–13 | 72.9% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 28 | 1974 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,942 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1973 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 28 | 1975 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,838 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1974 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,877 | 0 | 34 | 1976 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 1975 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 38 | 1977 | 24–19 | 55.8% | — | 1,892 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 1976 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 38 | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 1977 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1978 | 15–6 | 71.4% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 39 | 1980 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1980 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1981 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,711 | 0 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |