H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Gail Sherriff vs Janet Newberry H2H: 2-1
Gail Sherriff holds a 2–1 lead over Janet Newberry in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Gail Sherriff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Janet Newberry won the 1975 US Open second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 81
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 1975* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Janet Newberry | 6-2 6-4 | Gail Sherriff | Match data |
| Aug 11, 1975 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Gail Sherriff | 6-4 6-2 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
| Sep 26, 1969* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Gail Sherriff | 4-6 6-4 7-5 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gail Sherriff | — | — | — | 1,978 | 342 | 145 | 70.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 41 |
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gail Sherriff | Janet Newberry | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1968 | 65–14 | 82.3% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 13 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1969 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 17 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1970 | 52–19 | 73.2% | — | 1,933 | 0 | 21 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1971 | 49–20 | 71.0% | — | 1,921 | 0 | 23 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 1972 | 35–13 | 72.9% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1973 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1974 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,877 | 0 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1975 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1976 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1977 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1978 | 15–6 | 71.4% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1980 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1981 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,711 | 0 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |