H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Gail Sherriff vs Raquel Giscafre H2H: 2-0

Gail Sherriff holds a 2–0 lead over Raquel Giscafre in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gail Sherriff leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Gail Sherriff won the 1974 Dublin final 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gail Sherriff
FRA Age 81 Right-Handed
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Raquel Giscafre
ARG Age 77

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gail Sherriff 6-4 6-1 Raquel Giscafre Match data Jul 14, 1974* F Dublin WTA 250 Clay
Gail Sherriff 7-5 6-4 Raquel Giscafre Match data Mar 28, 1969* R16 Nice Lawn Club WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gail Sherriff — — — 1,998 346 145 70.5% 0 0 0 0 38 38
Raquel Giscafre — — — 1,798 86 120 41.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gail Sherriff Raquel Giscafre
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1968 5–8 38.5% — 1,494 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1969 9–15 37.5% — 1,489 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1970 3–2 60.0% — 1,504 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1971 5–13 27.8% — 1,467 0 0
23 1968 69–14 83.1% — 1,861 0 10 1972 6–16 27.3% — 1,488 0 0
24 1969 45–22 67.2% — 1,801 0 14 1973 11–11 50.0% — 1,605 0 1
25 1970 52–19 73.2% — 1,938 0 18 1974 26–17 60.5% — 1,743 0 3
26 1971 49–20 71.0% — 1,929 0 20 1975 15–18 45.5% — 1,727 0 4
27 1972 35–13 72.9% — 1,837 0 25 1976 2–3 40.0% — 1,710 0 4
28 1973 3–7 30.0% — 1,742 0 25 1977 2–6 25.0% — 1,658 0 4
29 1974 30–10 75.0% — 1,854 0 31 1978 1–8 11.1% — 1,558 0 4
30 1975 17–10 63.0% — 1,823 0 35 1979 1–1 50.0% — 1,564 0 4
31 1976 18–10 64.3% — 1,790 0 35 1980 0–2 0.0% — 1,538 0 4
32 1977 0–3 0.0% — 1,752 0 35 — — — — — — —
33 1978 15–6 71.4% — 1,769 0 36 — — — — — — —
34 1979 1–4 20.0% — 1,719 0 36 — — — — — — —
35 1980 9–5 64.3% — 1,701 0 37 — — — — — — —
36 1981 3–1 75.0% — 1,709 0 38 — — — — — — —
37 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,697 0 38 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gail Sherriff Raquel Giscafre
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 — — — — 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — 9 14 23 39.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 — — — — 3 8 11 27.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
23 1968 — — — — 58 8 66 87.9% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — —
24 1969 3 2 5 60.0% 26 9 35 74.3% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
25 1970 — — — — 39 11 50 78.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1974 1 1 2 50.0% 21 8 29 72.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 1971 — — — — 29 11 40 72.5% 20 9 29 69.0% — — — — 1975 1 5 6 16.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
27 1972 6 1 7 85.7% 17 6 23 73.9% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1976 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1977 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1974 — — — — 26 6 32 81.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1975 2 1 3 66.7% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 1976 — — — — 18 9 27 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 1977 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1980 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 7 19 63.2% 244 78 322 75.8% 69 51 120 57.5% 3 4 7 42.9% — 3 10 13 23.1% 67 66 133 50.4% 11 33 44 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gail Sherriff Raquel Giscafre
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1495 94.8 — — — — — -8 — 36.0% -1.24 0–1 — — -0.01
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1490 111.5 — — — — — -2 — 40.4% -0.28 0–1 — — +1.55
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1505 104.3 — — — — — +28 — 60.0% +1.10 — — — +1.15
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1468 99.0 — — — — — +19 -2 32.4% -1.76 1–3 (25%) — — +1.07
23 1968 1861 142.2 — — — — — +190 -283 81.1% +2.55 7–4 (64%) — — +1.11 1972 1489 108.6 — — — — +89 -52 -8 31.8% -1.61 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.68
24 1969 1802 140.9 — — — — -199 +203 -86 70.4% +1.76 2–5 (29%) — — -0.45 1973 1606 135.2 — — — — — +16 -154 52.5% +0.58 1–1 — — +1.95
25 1970 1938 147.4 — — — — -325 +71 -84 69.8% +1.56 7–4 (64%) — — -3.95 1974 1743 135.9 — — — — -177 +93 -250 59.1% +0.59 8–5 (62%) 4–2 (67%) 106.5 +0.72
26 1971 1929 151.8 — — — — — +128 -64 70.3% +1.59 8–8 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 97.7 -3.26 1975 1728 134.7 — — — — -62 +89 — 47.3% -0.26 3–7 (30%) 1–3 (25%) 94.6 +0.32
27 1972 1837 140.7 — — — — -55 +123 -77 68.7% +1.58 5–6 (45%) 1–1 — +0.94 1976 1711 111.5 — — — — — +86 — 40.0% -0.70 — — — -0.40
28 1973 1743 112.1 — — — — -27 +149 — 39.1% -0.52 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 93.1 +0.20 1977 1658 103.2 — — — — — +95 — 27.8% -1.61 1–1 0–1 — -0.01
29 1974 1854 142.4 — — — — — +166 -128 72.0% +1.63 5–3 (63%) 2–0 — -0.12 1978 1559 95.5 — — — — — — -163 21.1% -1.95 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.61
30 1975 1824 140.3 — — — — -83 +144 — 58.1% +0.79 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 103.4 -0.18 1979 1565 101.2 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — +0.11
31 1976 1790 139.8 — — — — — +74 — 63.9% +1.52 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 90.7 +0.01 1980 1539 91.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.22
32 1977 1753 108.3 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1978 1770 126.7 — — — — — +81 -68 60.4% +0.92 7–1 (88%) 3–2 (60%) 105.3 +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1979 1719 114.6 — — — — — — — 27.3% -0.64 0–1 0–1 — -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1980 1702 129.0 — — — — — +183 -49 65.6% +1.69 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +1.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1981 1710 113.1 — — — — — — — 66.7% +2.11 1–0 — — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1982 1698 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1999 147.8 — — — — -122 +140 -103 68.6% +1.59 51–46 (53%) 15–15 (50%) 92.8 -0.90 — 1798 123.7 — — — — -73 +40 -101 43.7% -0.47 18–23 (44%) 7–8 (47%) 98.7 +3.08

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.