H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Gala Leon Garcia vs Jana Nejedly H2H: 2-0
Gala Leon Garcia holds a 2–0 lead over Jana Nejedly in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gala Leon Garcia leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Gala Leon Garcia won the 2000 Amelia Island second round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2000* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Gala Leon Garcia | 6-1 6-1 | Jana Nejedly | Match data |
| Apr 29, 1999* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Gala Leon Garcia | 6-2 7-5 | Jana Nejedly | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gala Leon Garcia | #361 | #27 | 978 | 1,837 | 117 | 141 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Jana Nejedly | #914 | #64 | 488 | 1,626 | 49 | 104 | 32.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gala Leon Garcia | Jana Nejedly | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #328 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #82 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #89 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #130 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #56 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #75 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #53 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #88 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #31 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #69 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #96 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #130 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #233 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |