H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Gigi Fernandez vs Pam Casale H2H: 0-3
Pam Casale holds a 3–0 lead over Gigi Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Pam Casale leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Casale won the 1986 Houston third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 1986* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Pam Casale | 6-4 6-2 | Gigi Fernandez | Match data |
| Sep 28, 1984* | New Orleans | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Pam Casale | 7-6 7-5 | Gigi Fernandez | Match data |
| Aug 2, 1983* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Pam Casale | 6-2 6-3 | Gigi Fernandez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gigi Fernandez | #181 | #17 | 247 | 1,912 | 227 | 217 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Pam Casale | #671 | #14 | 22 | 1,944 | 168 | 147 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gigi Fernandez | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #27 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #14 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #57 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #41 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #53 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #169 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #23 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #36 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #65 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1996 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #112 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1997 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |