H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Gisela Dulko vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 2-6

Iveta Benesova holds a 6–2 lead over Gisela Dulko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Iveta Benesova leads 4–2 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Iveta Benesova won the 2011 Rome second round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gisela Dulko
ARG Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 6
8 main draw meetings
Iveta Benesova
CZE Age 43 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 11, 2011* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Iveta Benesova #58 6-2 6-1 Gisela Dulko #52 Match data
Mar 3, 2011* Monterrey WTA 500 R32 Hard Gisela Dulko #56 6-2 7-6(3) Iveta Benesova #47 Match data
Oct 1, 2009* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Hard Iveta Benesova #39 6-3 3-6 6-4 Gisela Dulko #30 Match data
Mar 26, 2009* Miami WTA 1000 R32 Hard Iveta Benesova #31 6-3 6-2 Gisela Dulko #35 Match data
Jan 17, 2009* Hobart WTA 250 QF Hard Iveta Benesova #41 6-4 6-4 Gisela Dulko #50 Match data
Mar 20, 2007* Miami WTA 1000 R128 Hard Iveta Benesova #96 6-3 6-3 Gisela Dulko #51 Match data
Jan 15, 2005* Hobart WTA 250 SF Hard Gisela Dulko #34 7-5 6-2 Iveta Benesova #37 Match data
Apr 18, 2003* Budapest WTA 250 R16 Clay Iveta Benesova #74 6-3 7-5 Gisela Dulko #142 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gisela Dulko #305 #26 1,695 1,798 192 179 51.8% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Iveta Benesova #671 #25 1,811 1,760 177 221 44.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gisela Dulko Iveta Benesova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–1 0.0% #188 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 4–3 57.1% #154 1,528 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 5–7 41.7% #125 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 22–18 55.0% #33 1,713 0 0 2002 6–9 40.0% #82 1,565 0 0
20 2005 32–23 58.2% #26 1,726 0 0 2003 9–19 32.1% #132 1,478 0 0
21 2006 16–23 41.0% #59 1,573 0 0 2004 25–19 56.8% #36 1,657 0 1
22 2007 29–23 55.8% #37 1,702 0 2 2005 21–27 43.8% #55 1,613 0 1
23 2008 18–20 47.4% #51 1,658 0 3 2006 17–21 44.7% #58 1,594 0 1
24 2009 28–20 58.3% #36 1,734 0 3 2007 6–14 30.0% #116 1,522 0 1
25 2010 21–21 50.0% #48 1,686 0 3 2008 20–17 54.1% #43 1,641 0 1
26 2011 15–15 50.0% #67 1,650 0 4 2009 29–25 53.7% #38 1,646 0 1
27 2012 2–5 28.6% #305 1,604 0 4 2010 18–24 42.9% #59 1,636 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2011 16–24 40.0% #54 1,650 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2012 10–17 37.0% #81 1,587 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2014 0–5 0.0% #671 1,526 0 2