H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Gisela Dulko vs Stephanie Foretz Gacon H2H: 3-1

Gisela Dulko holds a 3–1 lead over Stephanie Foretz Gacon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Gisela Dulko leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2009 Wimbledon first round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gisela Dulko
ARG Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Stephanie Foretz Gacon
Age 45 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 24, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Gisela Dulko #45 6-3 7-5 Stephanie Foretz Gacon Match data
Aug 31, 2005* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Gisela Dulko #29 6-3 6-2 Stephanie Foretz Gacon Match data
Apr 28, 2005* Estoril WTA 250 R32 Clay Gisela Dulko #39 7-6(2) 6-2 Stephanie Foretz Gacon Match data
Jun 11, 2003* Birmingham WTA 250 R64 Grass Stephanie Foretz Gacon 6-3 6-2 Gisela Dulko #134 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gisela Dulko #305 #26 1,695 1,798 192 179 51.8% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Stephanie Foretz Gacon — — — 1,647 61 115 34.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gisela Dulko Stephanie Foretz Gacon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–1 0.0% #188 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 4–3 57.1% #154 1,528 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 5–7 41.7% #125 1,516 0 0 1999 1–2 33.3% — 1,511 0 0
19 2004 22–18 55.0% #33 1,713 0 0 2000 1–2 33.3% — 1,513 0 0
20 2005 32–23 58.2% #26 1,726 0 0 2001 5–6 45.5% — 1,558 0 0
21 2006 16–23 41.0% #59 1,573 0 0 2002 11–12 47.8% — 1,605 0 0
22 2007 29–23 55.8% #37 1,702 0 2 2003 12–15 44.4% — 1,588 0 0
23 2008 18–20 47.4% #51 1,658 0 3 2004 3–10 23.1% — 1,532 0 0
24 2009 28–20 58.3% #36 1,734 0 3 2005 5–14 26.3% — 1,501 0 0
25 2010 21–21 50.0% #48 1,686 0 3 2006 5–14 26.3% — 1,444 0 0
26 2011 15–15 50.0% #67 1,650 0 4 2007 2–6 25.0% — 1,457 0 0
27 2012 2–5 28.6% #305 1,604 0 4 2008 0–2 0.0% — 1,455 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2009 2–7 22.2% — 1,421 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2010 0–3 0.0% — 1,402 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2011 2–6 25.0% — 1,406 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2012 10–10 50.0% — 1,514 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2013 2–5 28.6% — 1,502 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0