H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Glynis Coles vs Janet Newberry H2H: 2-1
Glynis Coles holds a 2–1 lead over Janet Newberry in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Glynis Coles leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Glynis Coles won the 1974 Cardiff semifinal 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 72
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 1974* | Cardiff | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Glynis Coles | 6-2 6-2 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
| Jun 17, 1972* | Beckenham | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Glynis Coles | 6-4 8-6 | Janet Newberry | Match data |
| Jun 23, 1971* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Janet Newberry | 6-2 8-6 | Glynis Coles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glynis Coles | — | — | — | 1,835 | 144 | 190 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Janet Newberry | — | — | — | 1,919 | 238 | 187 | 56.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Glynis Coles | Janet Newberry | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 7–5 | 58.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 13–6 | 68.4% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 20–7 | 74.1% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 5 |
| 17 | 1971 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,765 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1972 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 20–17 | 54.1% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–19 | 62.7% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1974 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1975 | 26–21 | 55.3% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 31–22 | 58.5% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 1976 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1977 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1978 | 8–17 | 32.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,831 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 12–21 | 36.4% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 1980 | 3–19 | 13.6% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1982 | 0–11 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |