H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Glynis Coles vs Raquel Giscafre H2H: 0-2
Raquel Giscafre holds a 2–0 lead over Glynis Coles in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Raquel Giscafre leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Raquel Giscafre won the 1974 Edinburgh fourth round 6-4 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 72
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 77
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 1974* | Edinburgh | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Raquel Giscafre | 6-4 7-6(6) | Glynis Coles | Match data |
| Jun 9, 1974* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Raquel Giscafre | 6-1 7-6 | Glynis Coles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glynis Coles | — | — | — | 1,835 | 144 | 190 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Raquel Giscafre | — | — | — | 1,797 | 86 | 120 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Glynis Coles | Raquel Giscafre | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1971 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1972 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–19 | 62.7% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 26–21 | 55.3% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 8–17 | 32.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1980 | 3–19 | 13.6% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1982 | 0–11 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |