H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Grace Kim vs Phyllis Blackwell H2H: 1-1

Grace Kim and Phyllis Blackwell are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Phyllis Blackwell won the 1982 Lakewood round of 16 6-2 6-1.

USA Age 58
H2H
1 1
2 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Phyllis Blackwell 6-2 6-1 Grace Kim Match data Jun 25, 1982* R16 Lakewood WTA 250 Hard
Grace Kim 6-7 6-3 6-4 Phyllis Blackwell Match data Jun 18, 1982* R16 Flemington WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Grace Kim 1,705 47 82 36.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Phyllis Blackwell 1,634 28 26 51.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Grace Kim Phyllis Blackwell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1982 7–3 70.0% 1,585 0 1
15 1983 2–4 33.3% 1,591 0 1
16 1984 6–10 37.5% 1,622 0 1
17 1985 17–25 40.5% 1,694 0 1
18 1986 10–22 31.2% 1,605 0 1 1975 0–2 0.0% 1,464 0 0
19 1987 5–13 27.8% 1,515 0 1 1976 1–1 50.0% 1,465 0 0
20 1988 0–5 0.0% 1,469 0 1 1977 0–1 0.0% 1,451 0 0
23 1980 5–8 38.5% 1,466 0 0
25 1982 21–11 65.6% 1,605 0 1
26 1983 1–3 25.0% 1,593 0 1

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Grace Kim Phyllis Blackwell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1982 1586 114.0 +73 66.7% +1.10 3–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 103.8 +1.42
15 1983 1592 115.9 +65 30.8% -1.00 1–0 -0.06
16 1984 1622 113.8 +26 +18 36.6% -1.49 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 103.7 -0.48
17 1985 1694 125.2 +52 -205 -135 43.4% -0.79 6–9 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.5 -0.64
18 1986 1605 117.7 +47 -126 33.3% -1.54 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 99.0 +0.32 1975 1465 95.6 33.3% -1.34 0–2 +0.39
19 1987 1515 97.7 +45 -17 32.6% -1.47 3–4 (43%) 1–1 +2.17 1976 1466 99.1 50.0% 0.00 +0.07
20 1988 1469 96.4 -61 0.0% -3.90 0–1 -0.26 1977 1452 88.5 0.0% -6.00 +0.05
23 1980 1467 99.4 +51 37.5% -1.06 4–2 (67%) 2–0 +0.10
25 1982 1606 111.7 +41 -66 61.4% +0.53 5–3 (63%) 8–0 (100%) 109.3 +3.28
26 1983 1593 96.0 +36 22.2% -2.45 1–0 0–1 -0.17
Career 1705 119.1 +49 -161 -47 38.2% -1.14 21–19 (53%) 11–10 (52%) 103.5 +1.93 1634 103.1 +42 -66 49.6% -0.32 10–7 (59%) 10–1 (91%) 109.5 +7.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.