H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Hana Mandlikova vs Andrea Temesvari H2H: 3-0
Hana Mandlikova holds a 3–0 lead over Andrea Temesvari in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Hana Mandlikova leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1985 Virginia Slims Championships fourth round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 64
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 60
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 1985 | Virginia Slims Championships | WTA Finals | R16 | Carpet | Hana Mandlikova | 7-5 7-5 | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
| Nov 17, 1984* | Tokyo Lion Cup | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Hana Mandlikova | 6-4 6-3 | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
| May 31, 1983* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Hana Mandlikova | 6-2 6-1 | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hana Mandlikova | #31 | #3 | 157 | 2,299 | 516 | 191 | 73.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 25 |
| Andrea Temesvari | #932 | #7 | 109 | 2,021 | 185 | 178 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hana Mandlikova | Andrea Temesvari | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1978 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1979 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,985 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,988 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1980 | 76–17 | 81.7% | — | 2,230 | 1 | 11 | 1984 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1981 | 56–24 | 70.0% | — | 2,108 | 2 | 14 | 1985 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1982 | 35–19 | 64.8% | — | 1,998 | 2 | 14 | 1986 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1983 | 44–21 | 67.7% | — | 1,977 | 2 | 14 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,762 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1984 | 47–11 | 81.0% | #3 | 2,081 | 2 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1985 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #3 | 2,210 | 3 | 22 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #43 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1986 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,233 | 3 | 22 | 1990 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1987 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,136 | 4 | 25 | 1991 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1988 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #29 | 2,031 | 4 | 25 | 1992 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1989 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,941 | 4 | 25 | 1993 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1990 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #31 | 1,809 | 4 | 25 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,487 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #181 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,533 | 0 | 5 |