H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Hana Mandlikova vs Anne Smith H2H: 3-0
Hana Mandlikova holds a 3–0 lead over Anne Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Hana Mandlikova leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1987 Australian Open third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 64
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 1987* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Hana Mandlikova | 6-3 6-2 | Anne Smith | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1981* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Hana Mandlikova | 6-1 6-4 | Anne Smith | Match data |
| Jan 31, 1980* | Seattle | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Hana Mandlikova | 6-3 6-2 | Anne Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hana Mandlikova | #31 | #3 | 157 | 2,299 | 516 | 191 | 73.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 25 |
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,050 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hana Mandlikova | Anne Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1978 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1979 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,985 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1980 | 76–17 | 81.7% | — | 2,230 | 1 | 11 | 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1981 | 56–24 | 70.0% | — | 2,108 | 2 | 14 | 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1982 | 35–19 | 64.8% | — | 1,998 | 2 | 14 | 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1983 | 44–21 | 67.7% | — | 1,977 | 2 | 14 | 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1984 | 47–11 | 81.0% | #3 | 2,081 | 2 | 19 | 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1985 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #3 | 2,210 | 3 | 22 | 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1986 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,233 | 3 | 22 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1987 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,136 | 4 | 25 | 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1988 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #29 | 2,031 | 4 | 25 | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1989 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,941 | 4 | 25 | 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1990 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #31 | 1,809 | 4 | 25 | 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 3 |