H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Hana Mandlikova vs Barbara Potter H2H: 7-1

Hana Mandlikova holds a 7–1 lead over Barbara Potter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Hana Mandlikova leads 5–0 on carpet and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Potter won the 1987 Canadian Open round of 16 6-4 6-4.

AUS Age 64 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
7 – 1
8 main-draw meetings
USA Age 65 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Potter #16 6-4 6-4 Hana Mandlikova #4 Match data Aug 21, 1987* R16 Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Hana Mandlikova #4 6-4 6-2 Barbara Potter #35 Match data Mar 29, 1987* F Washington Open WTA 500 Carpet
Hana Mandlikova #5 6-4 6-4 Barbara Potter #24 Match data Feb 4, 1984* SF Houston WTA 250 Carpet
Hana Mandlikova 4-6 6-3 7-6 Barbara Potter Match data Dec 19, 1982* QF East Rutherford WTA 250 Hard
Hana Mandlikova 7-5 6-4 Barbara Potter Match data Aug 21, 1981* R16 Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Hana Mandlikova 6-4 6-2 Barbara Potter Match data Jan 31, 1981* SF Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Hana Mandlikova 6-1 6-4 Barbara Potter Match data Nov 15, 1980* SF Amsterdam WTA 250 Carpet
Hana Mandlikova 5-7 6-4 6-1 Barbara Potter Match data Nov 13, 1980* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hana Mandlikova — #3 157 2,316 518 193 72.9% 4 0 0 6 17 27
Barbara Potter — #8 63 2,098 303 191 61.3% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hana Mandlikova Barbara Potter
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,758 0 2 1978 4–7 36.4% — 1,532 0 0
17 1979 37–14 72.5% — 1,991 0 7 1979 8–22 26.7% — 1,620 0 0
18 1980 76–17 81.7% #4 2,237 1 13 1980 27–22 55.1% — 1,875 0 0
19 1981 56–25 69.1% #5 2,128 2 16 1981 47–23 67.1% #10 1,944 0 0
20 1982 35–19 64.8% #7 2,027 2 16 1982 43–22 66.2% #8 1,998 0 2
21 1983 44–21 67.7% — 1,983 2 16 1983 28–20 58.3% — 1,851 0 2
22 1984 47–11 81.0% #3 2,085 2 21 1984 35–17 67.3% #12 1,952 0 2
23 1985 53–14 79.1% #3 2,211 3 24 1985 31–16 66.0% — 1,900 0 3
24 1986 44–15 74.6% #4 2,242 3 24 1986 14–10 58.3% #26 1,881 0 3
25 1987 47–13 78.3% #5 2,157 4 27 1987 25–13 65.8% #12 1,899 0 4
26 1988 15–7 68.2% #29 2,045 4 27 1988 36–14 72.0% #10 1,919 0 5
27 1989 33–19 63.5% #14 1,946 4 27 1989 5–5 50.0% #106 1,845 0 5
28 1990 8–9 47.1% — 1,810 4 27 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hana Mandlikova Barbara Potter
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 1978 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
17 1979 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 23 4 27 85.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 1979 4 8 12 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3%
18 1980 19 4 23 82.6% 19 5 24 79.2% 18 3 21 85.7% 20 5 25 80.0% 1980 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 19 14 33 57.6%
19 1981 11 4 15 73.3% 14 5 19 73.7% 9 3 12 75.0% 22 13 35 62.9% 1981 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 12 6 18 66.7% 27 14 41 65.9%
20 1982 11 5 16 68.8% 12 5 17 70.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1982 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 28 10 38 73.7%
21 1983 12 4 16 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 1983 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 10 8 18 55.6%
22 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 27 2 29 93.1% 1984 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 11 4 15 73.3% 17 9 26 65.4%
23 1985 22 5 27 81.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 14 2 16 87.5% 1985 12 4 16 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 7 16 56.3%
24 1986 7 2 9 77.8% 11 3 14 78.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 18 8 26 69.2% 1986 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
25 1987 14 5 19 73.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 12 1 13 92.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 1987 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8%
26 1988 11 4 15 73.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1988 25 9 34 73.5% — — — — 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 1989 19 9 28 67.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1989 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 143 55 198 72.2% 119 47 166 71.7% 116 36 152 76.3% 133 52 185 71.9% — 89 54 143 62.2% 5 8 13 38.5% 68 39 107 63.6% 141 90 231 61.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hana Mandlikova Barbara Potter
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1977 1492 100.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1978 1759 142.2 — — — — — -127 -39 71.4% +1.84 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 104.0 +1.40 1978 1533 114.1 — — — — +58 — +55 35.7% -1.14 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.26
17 1979 1991 150.8 — — — — -305 -197 +5 67.6% +1.46 8–3 (73%) 5–6 (45%) 107.5 -0.89 1979 1621 143.2 — — — — +30 -115 -41 30.3% -0.89 4–6 (40%) 1–8 (11%) 95.5 -1.66
18 1980 2238 169.1 — — — — -86 -220 -74 77.5% +2.09 15–12 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 107.9 -9.35 1980 1876 153.1 — — — — +17 — -301 56.8% +0.53 4–11 (27%) 5–6 (45%) 94.6 +0.47
19 1981 2129 169.7 — — — — -47 -13 +79 69.9% +1.55 7–4 (64%) 5–6 (45%) 100.5 -7.13 1981 1944 150.6 — — — — -2 — -145 63.1% +0.79 12–7 (63%) 9–10 (47%) 101.6 -1.65
20 1982 2027 155.4 — — — — +43 +110 +36 60.3% +0.61 12–5 (71%) 6–5 (55%) 101.1 -5.96 1982 1999 162.9 — — — — +57 — -127 63.3% +0.89 10–7 (59%) 12–14 (46%) 102.4 -2.52
21 1983 1984 163.7 — — — — +67 +169 +26 70.3% +1.45 3–9 (25%) 7–1 (88%) 95.7 -3.62 1983 1852 139.4 — — — — +53 -246 +13 58.6% +0.77 6–9 (40%) 8–8 (50%) 93.0 +1.63
22 1984 2085 166.1 — — — — +42 +34 -16 76.7% +2.05 10–5 (67%) 8–4 (67%) 103.0 -2.48 1984 1953 157.7 — — — — -8 — -15 67.0% +1.24 3–7 (30%) 8–4 (67%) 94.3 -1.58
23 1985 2211 170.8 — — — — +71 -92 -92 75.0% +1.78 9–5 (64%) 12–3 (80%) 109.1 -5.37 1985 1900 142.6 — — — — -7 -288 +63 61.9% +0.74 8–7 (53%) 12–5 (71%) 102.4 +0.02
24 1986 2242 175.0 — — — — +27 -50 -79 70.7% +1.50 10–5 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 98.7 -6.69 1986 1882 145.3 — — — — +12 — — 56.1% +0.37 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 100.5 -2.28
25 1987 2157 169.0 — — — — +17 +18 +141 75.8% +1.97 9–3 (75%) 7–4 (64%) 102.5 -3.70 1987 1900 145.8 — — — — +27 — — 64.3% +0.85 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 103.0 +0.37
26 1988 2046 145.0 — — — — +89 +59 +204 65.3% +1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 93.6 -0.30 1988 1920 147.3 — — — — +7 — +50 71.4% +1.21 4–8 (33%) 12–3 (80%) 100.4 +2.17
27 1989 1946 155.2 — — — — +75 +101 +225 57.5% +0.38 15–3 (83%) 9–3 (75%) 105.4 -3.66 1989 1846 116.8 — — — — -9 — — 52.2% -0.09 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 96.3 +0.55
28 1990 1811 125.0 — — — — +120 +175 +361 51.4% +0.19 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2317 169.5 — — — — +11 -15 +16 70.1% +1.51 107–63 (63%) 76–52 (59%) 107.1 -6.75 — 2099 155.7 — — — — +18 -226 -45 60.0% +0.67 66–75 (47%) 81–67 (55%) 98.1 -0.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.