H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Hana Mandlikova vs Betty Stove H2H: 4-0
Hana Mandlikova holds a 4–0 lead over Betty Stove in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Hana Mandlikova leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1982 Filderstadt third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 64
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
NED
Age 81
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 1982* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Hana Mandlikova | 6-3 6-2 | Betty Stove | Match data |
| May 27, 1982* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Hana Mandlikova | 6-3 6-4 | Betty Stove | Match data |
| Jan 22, 1981* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Hana Mandlikova | 6-1 6-4 | Betty Stove | Match data |
| Dec 13, 1980* | Adelaide | WTA 500 | SF | Grass | Hana Mandlikova | 6-2 6-3 | Betty Stove | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hana Mandlikova | #31 | #3 | 157 | 2,299 | 516 | 191 | 73.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 25 |
| Betty Stove | — | — | — | 2,165 | 413 | 304 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hana Mandlikova | Betty Stove | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1978 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1979 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,985 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1980 | 76–17 | 81.7% | — | 2,230 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 56–24 | 70.0% | — | 2,108 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1982 | 35–19 | 64.8% | — | 1,998 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1983 | 44–21 | 67.7% | — | 1,977 | 2 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1984 | 47–11 | 81.0% | #3 | 2,081 | 2 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1985 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #3 | 2,210 | 3 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1986 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,233 | 3 | 22 | 1969 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1987 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,136 | 4 | 25 | 1970 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1988 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #29 | 2,031 | 4 | 25 | 1971 | 48–28 | 63.2% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1989 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,941 | 4 | 25 | 1972 | 46–25 | 64.8% | — | 1,959 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1990 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #31 | 1,809 | 4 | 25 | 1973 | 37–27 | 57.8% | — | 1,921 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 24–20 | 54.5% | — | 1,954 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,953 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 37–20 | 64.9% | — | 2,076 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 46–25 | 64.8% | — | 2,069 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 51–24 | 68.0% | — | 2,090 | 0 | 7 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 26–24 | 52.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 7 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 24–23 | 51.1% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 7 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 5–20 | 20.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 7 |