H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Hana Mandlikova vs Candy Reynolds H2H: 2-1
Hana Mandlikova holds a 2–1 lead over Candy Reynolds in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Hana Mandlikova leads 1–0 on clay, while Candy Reynolds leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Candy Reynolds won the 1982 Wimbledon second round 6-3 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 64
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 71
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1982* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Candy Reynolds | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | Hana Mandlikova | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1982* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Hana Mandlikova | 6-2 6-4 | Candy Reynolds | Match data |
| Sep 4, 1981* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Hana Mandlikova | 6-4 6-4 | Candy Reynolds | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hana Mandlikova | #31 | #3 | 157 | 2,299 | 516 | 191 | 73.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 25 |
| Candy Reynolds | #485 | #76 | 5 | 1,859 | 84 | 140 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hana Mandlikova | Candy Reynolds | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1978 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1979 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,985 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1980 | 76–17 | 81.7% | — | 2,230 | 1 | 11 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 56–24 | 70.0% | — | 2,108 | 2 | 14 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 35–19 | 64.8% | — | 1,998 | 2 | 14 | 1975 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 44–21 | 67.7% | — | 1,977 | 2 | 14 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 47–11 | 81.0% | #3 | 2,081 | 2 | 19 | 1977 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,419 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #3 | 2,210 | 3 | 22 | 1978 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,233 | 3 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1987 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,136 | 4 | 25 | 1980 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #29 | 2,031 | 4 | 25 | 1981 | 19–17 | 52.8% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1989 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,941 | 4 | 25 | 1982 | 17–22 | 43.6% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1990 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #31 | 1,809 | 4 | 25 | 1983 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #127 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #177 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #251 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #485 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |