H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Hana Mandlikova vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 3-1
Hana Mandlikova holds a 3–1 lead over Catarina Lindqvist Ryan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Hana Mandlikova leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1985 Princeton final 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 64
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 1985* | Princeton | WTA 250 | F | Carpet | Hana Mandlikova | 6-3 7-5 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Jan 26, 1985* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 3-6 7-5 6-1 | Hana Mandlikova | Match data |
| Jun 29, 1984* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Hana Mandlikova | 7-5 6-3 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| May 6, 1982* | Perugia | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Hana Mandlikova | 6-3 6-4 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hana Mandlikova | #31 | #3 | 157 | 2,299 | 516 | 191 | 73.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 25 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Hana Mandlikova | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,985 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 76–17 | 81.7% | — | 2,230 | 1 | 11 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 56–24 | 70.0% | — | 2,108 | 2 | 14 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 35–19 | 64.8% | — | 1,998 | 2 | 14 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 1983 | 44–21 | 67.7% | — | 1,977 | 2 | 14 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 1984 | 47–11 | 81.0% | #3 | 2,081 | 2 | 19 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 1985 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #3 | 2,210 | 3 | 22 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 |
| 1986 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,233 | 3 | 22 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,136 | 4 | 25 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 1988 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #29 | 2,031 | 4 | 25 | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 |
| 1989 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,941 | 4 | 25 | 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 1990 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #31 | 1,809 | 4 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |