H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Hana Mandlikova vs Heather Ludloff H2H: 1-0
Hana Mandlikova holds a 1–0 lead over Heather Ludloff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hana Mandlikova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1983 Detroit fourth round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 64
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 1983* | Detroit | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Hana Mandlikova | 6-0 6-3 | Heather Ludloff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hana Mandlikova | #31 | #3 | 157 | 2,299 | 516 | 191 | 73.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 25 |
| Heather Ludloff | #512 | #69 | 11 | 1,576 | 48 | 106 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hana Mandlikova | Heather Ludloff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1978 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1979 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,985 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 76–17 | 81.7% | — | 2,230 | 1 | 11 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 56–24 | 70.0% | — | 2,108 | 2 | 14 | 1980 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 35–19 | 64.8% | — | 1,998 | 2 | 14 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 44–21 | 67.7% | — | 1,977 | 2 | 14 | 1982 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 47–11 | 81.0% | #3 | 2,081 | 2 | 19 | 1983 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #3 | 2,210 | 3 | 22 | 1984 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,233 | 3 | 22 | 1985 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #127 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,136 | 4 | 25 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #29 | 2,031 | 4 | 25 | 1987 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1989 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,941 | 4 | 25 | 1988 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1990 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #31 | 1,809 | 4 | 25 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #164 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #219 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #141 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #282 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |